From: Karel Gardas <kgardas@objectsecurity.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <bonzini@gnu.org>
Cc: GCC Mailing List <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Compilation performance comparison of gcc3.4.1 and gcc3.5.0 2004-08-30 on MICO sources
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 10:46:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.43.0408311227330.1006-100000@thinkpad.gardas.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <413452D4.6040903@gnu.org>
On Tue, 31 Aug 2004, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> >>>1) typecode.cc: 40% regression on O1 while 7% speedup on O2
> >>
> >>Can you show us the time report for the 40% regression?
>
> Also for 3.4.1?
Sure!
Execution times (seconds)
garbage collection : 0.79 ( 6%) usr 0.00 ( 0%) sys 0.84 ( 5%) wall
cfg construction : 0.09 ( 1%) usr 0.00 ( 0%) sys 0.11 ( 1%) wall
cfg cleanup : 0.18 ( 1%) usr 0.00 ( 0%) sys 0.16 ( 1%) wall
trivially dead code : 0.10 ( 1%) usr 0.01 ( 0%) sys 0.14 ( 1%) wall
life analysis : 0.80 ( 6%) usr 0.00 ( 0%) sys 0.85 ( 5%) wall
life info update : 0.08 ( 1%) usr 0.00 ( 0%) sys 0.15 ( 1%) wall
alias analysis : 0.16 ( 1%) usr 0.00 ( 0%) sys 0.21 ( 1%) wall
register scan : 0.13 ( 1%) usr 0.00 ( 0%) sys 0.18 ( 1%) wall
rebuild jump labels : 0.07 ( 0%) usr 0.01 ( 0%) sys 0.05 ( 0%) wall
preprocessing : 0.44 ( 3%) usr 0.21 (10%) sys 0.65 ( 4%) wall
parser : 4.41 (31%) usr 0.67 (31%) sys 5.22 (31%) wall
name lookup : 1.61 (11%) usr 1.17 (53%) sys 2.90 (17%) wall
expand : 0.79 ( 6%) usr 0.03 ( 1%) sys 0.78 ( 5%) wall
varconst : 0.04 ( 0%) usr 0.01 ( 0%) sys 0.09 ( 1%) wall
integration : 0.65 ( 5%) usr 0.00 ( 0%) sys 0.67 ( 4%) wall
jump : 0.05 ( 0%) usr 0.02 ( 1%) sys 0.02 ( 0%) wall
CSE : 0.49 ( 3%) usr 0.00 ( 0%) sys 0.46 ( 3%) wall
loop analysis : 0.03 ( 0%) usr 0.00 ( 0%) sys 0.02 ( 0%) wall
branch prediction : 0.19 ( 1%) usr 0.00 ( 0%) sys 0.16 ( 1%) wall
flow analysis : 0.04 ( 0%) usr 0.00 ( 0%) sys 0.04 ( 0%) wall
combiner : 0.34 ( 2%) usr 0.00 ( 0%) sys 0.42 ( 2%) wall
if-conversion : 0.09 ( 1%) usr 0.00 ( 0%) sys 0.05 ( 0%) wall
mode switching : 0.00 ( 0%) usr 0.00 ( 0%) sys 0.01 ( 0%) wall
local alloc : 0.34 ( 2%) usr 0.00 ( 0%) sys 0.28 ( 2%) wall
global alloc : 0.91 ( 6%) usr 0.02 ( 1%) sys 0.83 ( 5%) wall
reload CSE regs : 0.18 ( 1%) usr 0.00 ( 0%) sys 0.25 ( 1%) wall
flow 2 : 0.18 ( 1%) usr 0.01 ( 0%) sys 0.12 ( 1%) wall
if-conversion 2 : 0.04 ( 0%) usr 0.00 ( 0%) sys 0.02 ( 0%) wall
rename registers : 0.15 ( 1%) usr 0.00 ( 0%) sys 0.10 ( 1%) wall
machine dep reorg : 0.00 ( 0%) usr 0.00 ( 0%) sys 0.01 ( 0%) wall
shorten branches : 0.16 ( 1%) usr 0.00 ( 0%) sys 0.13 ( 1%) wall
final : 0.28 ( 2%) usr 0.01 ( 0%) sys 0.43 ( 3%) wall
symout : 0.01 ( 0%) usr 0.00 ( 0%) sys 0.03 ( 0%) wall
rest of compilation : 0.42 ( 3%) usr 0.02 ( 1%) sys 0.49 ( 3%) wall
TOTAL : 14.25 2.19 16.89
# cc1plus 14.26 2.21
# as 0.34 0.02
Karel
--
Karel Gardas kgardas@objectsecurity.com
ObjectSecurity Ltd. http://www.objectsecurity.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-08-31 10:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-08-31 9:58 Karel Gardas
2004-08-31 10:12 ` Steven Bosscher
2004-08-31 10:28 ` Karel Gardas
2004-08-31 10:44 ` Paolo Bonzini
2004-08-31 10:46 ` Karel Gardas [this message]
2004-08-31 10:49 ` Steven Bosscher
2004-08-31 11:00 ` Paolo Bonzini
2004-08-31 11:24 ` Steven Bosscher
2004-08-31 19:30 ` Mike Stump
2004-08-31 12:48 ` Karel Gardas
2004-09-01 7:18 ` Paolo Bonzini
2004-08-31 10:55 ` Steven Bosscher
2004-08-31 13:57 ` Karel Gardas
2004-09-01 11:18 ` Giovanni Bajo
2004-09-02 9:41 ` Karel Gardas
2004-09-02 20:32 ` Compilation performance comparison of gcc3.4.1 and gcc3.5.02004-08-30 " Giovanni Bajo
2004-09-04 7:35 ` Karel Gardas
2004-09-02 9:44 ` Compilation performance comparison of gcc3.4.1 and gcc3.5.0 2004-08-30 " Karel Gardas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.43.0408311227330.1006-100000@thinkpad.gardas.net \
--to=kgardas@objectsecurity.com \
--cc=bonzini@gnu.org \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).