From: Gcc k6 testing account <caligula@cam029208.student.utwente.nl>
To: Manfred Hollstein <manfred.h@gmx.net>
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Results for 3.3 20020814 (experimental) testsuite oni586-redhat-linux-gnu
Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2002 13:45:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0208182228040.21800-100000@cam029208.student.utwente.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3D5F710C.7050305@gmx.net>
On Sun, 18 Aug 2002, Manfred Hollstein wrote:
> Gcc k6 testing account wrote:
> > On Thu, 15 Aug 2002, Manfred Hollstein wrote:
> > [...]
> >>>Compiler version: 3.3 20020814 (experimental)
> >>>Platform: i586-redhat-linux-gnu
> >>>configure flags: --prefix=/opt/k6/HEAD --host=k6-redhat-linux-gnu --target=k6-redhat-linux-gnu --build=k6-redhat-linux-gnu --enable-languages=c,c++,objc,f77,java --enable-threads=posix
> >>>
> >>
> >>You explicitly enabled java, however, I don't see any testresults.
> >>Did your build fail for libjava?
> >>
> >>TIA, cheers.
> >>
> >>l8er
> >>manfred
> >>
> >
> >
> > Ave Manfred.
> >
> > The testresults-mail you saw is generated by a script that does a make
> > bootstrap and if the bootstrap is succesfull does a make -k check and
> > then sends the testresults. So at least the bootstrap is succesfull.
>
> Does your script exit if the bootstrap fails? IIRC, libjava is
> built as the final step of make bootstrap, so it might well be, that
> bootstrap *is* actually failing. FWIW, I didn't see any libjava
> related results in your posting from 20020815 either.
>
> Cheers.
>
> l8er
> manfred
>
My script exits if the bootstrap fails.
You can see it at cam029208.student.utwente.nl/~caligula/
the bootstrap script is bootstrap_en_test_var.sh.
I installed the last bootstrapped HEAD compiler and it installs libgcj!
But on the gcc list there's a discussion going on about failing java test
on more architectures. There's also some discussion about patches so I
think the failing libjava tests are not specific for k6.
If the problem continues for let's say two weeks,I'm gonnna bootstrap a
i586 and k6 compiler from the same sources and see if there any difference
in testresults.
Greetinx Martijn Uffing
prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-08-18 13:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <3D5B94C0.3060308@gmx.net>
2002-08-15 11:18 ` Gcc k6 testing account
2002-08-18 3:07 ` Results for 3.3 20020814 (experimental) testsuite on i586-redhat-linux-gnu Manfred Hollstein
2002-08-18 13:45 ` Gcc k6 testing account [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.44.0208182228040.21800-100000@cam029208.student.utwente.nl \
--to=caligula@cam029208.student.utwente.nl \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=manfred.h@gmx.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).