From: Richard Guenther <rguenth@tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de>
To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Another inlining idea
Date: Wed, 07 May 2003 20:46:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0305072242410.432-100000@goofy> (raw)
Hi!
In order to help the user specify inline decisions, how hard would it be
to implement an attribute that forces not inlining of the function itself,
but recursively all called functions from within it? F.i. once we start
processing the marked function, set a global flag to force all functions
inline. I'd suggest __attribute__((force_flat)).
Does this sound feasible?
Richard.
reply other threads:[~2003-05-07 20:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.44.0305072242410.432-100000@goofy \
--to=rguenth@tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).