From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15760 invoked by alias); 23 May 2003 19:22:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 19156 invoked from network); 23 May 2003 19:11:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO vortex.ices.utexas.edu) (128.83.68.102) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 23 May 2003 19:11:35 -0000 Received: from gandalf.ices.utexas.edu (IDENT:q0xd0SaXcqax2UnJhkQmhtfhm5kJH+TF@gandalf.ices.utexas.edu [128.83.68.35]) by vortex.ices.utexas.edu (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h4NJBXDh009038; Fri, 23 May 2003 14:11:33 -0500 Date: Fri, 23 May 2003 19:23:00 -0000 From: Wolfgang Bangerth To: Daniel Berlin cc: Volker Reichelt , , , , , , Subject: Re: your RESOLVED->CLOSED changes In-Reply-To: <98AB1BCE-8D39-11D7-B31E-000A95A34564@dberlin.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg02123.txt.bz2 > I can make VERIFIED and CLOSED options invisible to the user, so that > you don't ever see it, if you like. That would be nice. I don't care whether the state we use is called CLOSED or RESOLVED, but one state is enough (it seems the majority agrees with that). W. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Wolfgang Bangerth email: bangerth@ices.utexas.edu www: http://www.ices.utexas.edu/~bangerth/