From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7008 invoked by alias); 30 Jul 2003 20:06:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 6927 invoked from network); 30 Jul 2003 20:06:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO suneidesis.com) (213.208.87.130) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 30 Jul 2003 20:06:32 -0000 Received: from localhost (trevor@localhost) by suneidesis.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA13239 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2003 20:06:30 GMT Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 21:51:00 -0000 From: Trevor Jenkins X-X-Sender: trevor@suneidesis To: Gnu Compiler Collection Hackers Subject: Re: [GCC] Status of Chill-frontend and Pascal In-Reply-To: <19192.1059592628@www58.gmx.net> Message-ID: X-Archive: expiry=0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2003-07/txt/msg02261.txt.bz2 On Wed, 30 Jul 2003, Andreas Meier wrote: > in http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2002-06/msg01356.html Trevor Jenkins wrote, > what he wants to re-introduce the Chill-frontend. > What will be done with this frontend in near future? I've been waiting on a request for access to a Chill test suite. Can't now remember to whom that request was sent. My *only* reason for re-integrating Chill is as an example front-end. The sources are self-contained it being a recursive descent compiler not needing support from yacc/lex bison/flex. Much better than toy. If there is a real need for the Chill front-end to go back in then I can accelerate my efforts but as yours is the only request (here) in several months/years it doesn't seem to be a hot topic. > What will be done with the Pascal frontend in near future? No idea. I'm not involved other than asking the same question several years ago. Regards, Trevor <>< Re: deemed!