From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10723 invoked by alias); 19 Dec 2002 21:15:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 10700 invoked from network); 19 Dec 2002 21:15:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.cdt.org) (206.112.85.61) by 209.249.29.67 with SMTP; 19 Dec 2002 21:15:10 -0000 Received: from dberlin.org (h-69-3-5-6.MCLNVA23.covad.net [69.3.5.6]) by mail.cdt.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7DCB4900FB; Thu, 19 Dec 2002 16:11:55 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (HELO dberlin.org) by dberlin.org (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0.3) with ESMTP-TLS id 1940491; Thu, 19 Dec 2002 16:14:57 -0500 Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 15:22:00 -0000 From: Daniel Berlin To: Christopher Faylor Cc: Craig Rodrigues , "" , "" Subject: Re: Bugzilla for GCC project? In-Reply-To: <20021219204225.GA31017@redhat.com> Message-ID: References: <20021219111445.A1200@attbi.com> <20021219204225.GA31017@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2002-12/txt/msg01229.txt.bz2 On Thu, 19 Dec 2002, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 03:36:58PM -0500, Daniel Berlin wrote: Errr, just to be clear, I only wrote the part saying i had time and manpower, Craig wrote the pieces you've quoted. > >> - the new hardware failed > > We had a disk error which has since been corrected. > > >> - the ISP which hosts gcc.gnu.org was about to go out of business > > Not a problem any longer. > > >> - Red Hat's IT department was not supportive of the hardware/network > >> configuration and administration issues > > The new system is now safely ensconced in Raleigh on Red Hat's hefty > internet connection. So, it's close to going live. Probably in January. > Cool! > Didn't I make this observation recently in the gcc mailing list? Dunno. > > cgf >