From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14715 invoked by alias); 15 May 2003 10:19:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 14678 invoked from network); 15 May 2003 10:19:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO gold.csi.cam.ac.uk) (131.111.8.12) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 15 May 2003 10:19:04 -0000 Received: from student.cusu.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.179.82] helo=kern.srcf.societies.cam.ac.uk ident=mail) by gold.csi.cam.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19GFpH-0004Tb-00; Thu, 15 May 2003 11:19:03 +0100 Received: from jsm28 (helo=localhost) by kern.srcf.societies.cam.ac.uk with local-esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19GFpG-0003Vm-00; Thu, 15 May 2003 11:19:02 +0100 Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 10:19:00 -0000 From: "Joseph S. Myers" X-X-Sender: jsm28@kern.srcf.societies.cam.ac.uk To: Daniel Berlin cc: Mark Mitchell , gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: GCC 3.3 Branch Open In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg01501.txt.bz2 On Wed, 14 May 2003, Daniel Berlin wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla > > There is nothing for you to do yet in Bugzilla, since any changes you > made to the DB would be wiped out during final conversion anyway. > :) What's with the various different converter scripts (bug_email.pl, gnatsparse.py), both of which have lists of version numbers is, only one of which is mentioned in the releasing/branching notes and so knows of 3.3.1 (and neither of which knows of 3.2.3)? -- Joseph S. Myers jsm28@cam.ac.uk