From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18091 invoked by alias); 22 May 2003 18:19:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 18084 invoked from network); 22 May 2003 18:19:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO rose.csi.cam.ac.uk) (131.111.8.13) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 22 May 2003 18:19:03 -0000 Received: from student.cusu.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.179.82] helo=kern.srcf.societies.cam.ac.uk) by rose.csi.cam.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19Iuea-0003Zw-KV; Thu, 22 May 2003 19:19:00 +0100 Received: from jsm28 (helo=localhost) by kern.srcf.societies.cam.ac.uk with local-esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19Iuea-0008AS-00; Thu, 22 May 2003 19:19:00 +0100 Date: Thu, 22 May 2003 18:20:00 -0000 From: "Joseph S. Myers" X-X-Sender: jsm28@kern.srcf.societies.cam.ac.uk To: "H. J. Lu" cc: Daniel Berlin , Andreas Jaeger , gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Bugzilla CPU targets In-Reply-To: <20030522075520.A13355@lucon.org> Message-ID: References: <20030522000216.A6832@lucon.org> <1CAF03CC-8C63-11D7-85C9-000A95A34564@dberlin.org> <20030522075520.A13355@lucon.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Cam-ScannerAdmin: mail-scanner-support@ucs.cam.ac.uk X-Cam-AntiVirus: Not scanned X-Cam-SpamDetails: X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg02031.txt.bz2 On Thu, 22 May 2003, H. J. Lu wrote: > I am talking about targets in gcc/gcc/config. I counted there are > 34 different cpus. You don't worry about OSes. There are still > host/target/build fields. We could revisit splitting the "target" component into separate components for different targets (at least those targets with active maintainers and users) - so that, for target-specific bugs in "target", we don't need to overload the bug subject line with a target name. -- Joseph S. Myers jsm28@cam.ac.uk