From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25646 invoked by alias); 20 Jan 2004 16:48:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 25611 invoked from network); 20 Jan 2004 16:48:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO Cantor.suse.de) (195.135.220.2) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 20 Jan 2004 16:48:45 -0000 Received: from Hermes.suse.de (Hermes.suse.de [195.135.221.8]) (using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by Cantor.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBF2D49C5; Tue, 20 Jan 2004 17:48:44 +0100 (CET) Received: by wotan.suse.de (Postfix, from userid 10510) id B5EFC10716; Tue, 20 Jan 2004 17:48:44 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wotan.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6C55106A9; Tue, 20 Jan 2004 17:48:44 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 16:48:00 -0000 From: Michael Matz To: Denis Chertykov Cc: Giovanni Bajo , gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [new-ra] Development status? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <22e301c3dd71$1875c480$34b82997@bagio> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2004-01/txt/msg01515.txt.bz2 Hi, On Tue, 20 Jan 2004, Denis Chertykov wrote: > 4. Then, allocator must have a support for register elimination. Indeed, I forgot. > Michael ! I have completed the patch which calculate register classes > preferences as regclass (not as pre-reload). Cool. > Yes. I have converted regclass routines to work with webs. I had hoped there would be something better than regclass on webs. *sniff* > I was interested in comparision of results given by pre-reload based > web_class and regclass based web_class. They at least shouldn't be worse, I think, are they? > Are you ready to look at patch and results ? Yes, please. Ciao, Michael.