From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-105620-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 26620 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2004 15:15:03 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 26544 invoked from network); 23 Nov 2004 15:14:59 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO Cantor.suse.de) (195.135.220.2)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 23 Nov 2004 15:14:59 -0000
Received: from hermes.suse.de (hermes-ext.suse.de [195.135.221.8])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by Cantor.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A55B11595D0;
	Tue, 23 Nov 2004 16:14:58 +0100 (CET)
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 15:47:00 -0000
From: Michael Matz <matz@suse.de>
To: Andrew Pinski <pinskia@physics.uc.edu>
Cc: Steve Naroff <snaroff@apple.com>,
	gcc mailing list <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>, Matt Austern <austern@apple.com>,
	Daniel Berlin <dberlin@dberlin.org>,
	Ziemowit Laski <zlaski@apple.com>,
	Nathan Sidwell <nathan@codesourcery.com>,
	Joe Buck <Joe.Buck@synopsys.com>, Mike Stump <mrs@apple.com>
Subject: Re: generalized lvalues -- patch outline
In-Reply-To: <4D0584E2-3D61-11D9-AEB4-000A95D692F4@physics.uc.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0411231612130.29201@wotan.suse.de>
References: <4D2CF60C-3919-11D9-8BD2-000A95BCF344@apple.com>
 <20041117212847.A26376@synopsys.com> <6F5FC748-7BBD-44B9-8DDC-246949F16102@apple.com>
 <20041118102741.A8347@synopsys.com> <77E8D36A-C0C2-4B03-964C-BEE0FE7BBBC3@apple.com>
 <98C86CD4-39E2-11D9-B2D5-000A95BCF344@apple.com> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0411192234480.29201@wotan.suse.de>
 <CAE3B44A-3A8C-11D9-9070-000D9330C50E@apple.com> <20041119170011.A30410@synopsys.com>
 <9E6AD708-3A93-11D9-9070-000D9330C50E@apple.com> <20041119174042.A1311@synopsys.com>
 <90DC5074-3A96-11D9-9070-000D9330C50E@apple.com> <9CD04F70-3CC6-11D9-B847-000D9330C50E@apple.com>
 <41A253A2.1050205@codesourcery.com> <24BB97A2-3CD3-11D9-B847-000D9330C50E@apple.com>
 <41A30346.8050602@codesourcery.com> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0411231244000.29201@wotan.suse.de>
 <Pine.LNX.4.60.0411230833250.16150@dberlin.org> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0411231541340.29201@wotan.suse.de>
 <4D0584E2-3D61-11D9-AEB4-000A95D692F4@physics.uc.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-SW-Source: 2004-11/txt/msg00813.txt.bz2

Hi,

On Tue, 23 Nov 2004, Andrew Pinski wrote:

> if you had the following:
> 
> ((int*)a)++;
> 
> the better idea would be:
> 
> char *a1 = (char*)a;
> a1 += sizeof(int)/sizeof(char);
> a = (typeof(a))(a1);

Ah, yes ;-)

I disagree.  The better idea would have been if the C language would allow 
for the first construct.  It's shorter, and by giving this rewriting rule 
seems also to be easy to define.


Ciao,
Michael.