From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21861 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2004 22:41:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 21840 invoked from network); 23 Nov 2004 22:41:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO dberlin.org) (68.164.203.246) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 23 Nov 2004 22:41:20 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (HELO dberlin.org) by dberlin.org (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.6) with ESMTP-TLS id 7581264; Tue, 23 Nov 2004 17:41:20 -0500 Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 22:58:00 -0000 From: Daniel Berlin To: davidm@hpl.hp.com cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, binutils@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: GNU DWARF augmentation authority In-Reply-To: <16803.48031.364878.20655@napali.hpl.hp.com> Message-ID: References: <16803.47225.505991.886555@napali.hpl.hp.com> <16803.48031.364878.20655@napali.hpl.hp.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-SW-Source: 2004-11/txt/msg00858.txt.bz2 > Daniel> You want to email the dwarf2/3 committee reflector > > Daniel> Email Michael Eager at eager@eagercon.com. > > Daniel> He's the committee chair, and should be able to add you to > Daniel> the mailing list. > > That's interesting. I thought the augmentation string used by the GNU > toolchain are purely a GNU extension. Is that not so? Depends on what you mean by "purely". If you mean we control them, then yes, they are purely GNU. However, i'm pretty sure they were discussed (as were other extensions) on the reflector before they were implemented, so as not to cause gratuitous problems with other extensions, etc. I'm sure Jason Merrill can correct me if i'm wrong about this. > > --david >