From: "Joseph S. Myers" <jsm@polyomino.org.uk>
To: Andrew Pinski <pinskia@physics.uc.edu>
Cc: Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com>,
Steven Bosscher <stevenb@suse.de>,
gcc@gcc.gnu.org, dberlin@dberlin.org
Subject: Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29)
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 10:11:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0408300914100.1957@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CDB63C8A-FA1F-11D8-A02D-00039351ED8A@physics.uc.edu>
On Sun, 29 Aug 2004, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> I should note that the bootstrap time feels longer but I could be imagining
> things.
Bootstrap plus testsuite run time has been slowing down, by actual
observation (3.5 hours three months ago, 4 hours now; 45 minutes 3.5 years
ago), but because of the additional code being added to the compilers,
runtime libraries and testsuites that isn't really something to use as a
release criterion; users only build a release once (or once per system).
(I'd be very unlikely to object to a testsuite addition on the grounds of
increased testing time.) The time to build a fixed body of code with
different compilers, as shown for example in the SPEC timings, is the more
useful comparison since it avoids mixing the two variables of what is
being compiled and what is doing the compiling.
--
Joseph S. Myers http://www.srcf.ucam.org/~jsm28/gcc/
http://www.srcf.ucam.org/~jsm28/gcc/#c90status - status of C90 for GCC 3.5
jsm@polyomino.org.uk (personal mail)
jsm28@gcc.gnu.org (Bugzilla assignments and CCs)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-08-30 9:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-08-29 23:49 Mark Mitchell
2004-08-30 0:03 ` Andrew Pinski
2004-08-30 0:33 ` Mark Mitchell
2004-08-30 0:53 ` Daniel Berlin
2004-08-30 0:25 ` Steven Bosscher
2004-08-30 0:48 ` Mark Mitchell
2004-08-30 0:57 ` Steven Bosscher
2004-08-30 1:04 ` Mark Mitchell
2004-08-30 1:12 ` Andrew Pinski
2004-08-30 1:29 ` Mark Mitchell
2004-08-30 10:11 ` Joseph S. Myers [this message]
2004-08-30 2:46 ` Giovanni Bajo
2004-08-30 3:09 ` Matt Austern
2004-08-30 13:51 ` Speeding up C++ at -O0 (Was: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29)) Giovanni Bajo
2004-08-30 18:02 ` GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29) Joe Buck
2004-08-30 3:32 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2004-08-30 4:11 ` Mark Mitchell
2004-08-30 4:17 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2004-08-30 4:43 ` Mark Mitchell
2004-08-30 5:09 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2004-08-30 5:27 ` Mark Mitchell
2004-08-30 5:30 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2004-08-30 6:57 ` Mark Mitchell
2004-08-30 9:24 ` Steven Bosscher
2004-08-30 10:13 ` Giovanni Bajo
2004-08-30 10:26 ` Steven Bosscher
2004-08-30 16:34 ` Jan Hubicka
2004-08-30 11:02 ` Paolo Bonzini
2004-08-30 10:03 ` Steven Bosscher
2004-08-30 15:11 ` Mark Mitchell
2004-08-30 15:21 ` Jan Hubicka
2004-08-30 17:46 ` Jeffrey A Law
2004-08-30 1:09 ` Daniel Berlin
2004-08-30 1:53 ` Mark Mitchell
2004-08-30 7:34 ` Steven Bosscher
2004-08-30 8:15 ` Mark Mitchell
2004-08-30 14:16 ` Daniel Berlin
2004-08-30 15:10 ` Mark Mitchell
2004-08-30 3:03 ` Daniel Berlin
2004-08-30 3:20 ` Mark Mitchell
2004-08-31 17:35 ` Joseph S. Myers
2004-08-30 10:50 ` Dorit Naishlos
2004-08-30 15:12 ` Mark Mitchell
2004-08-30 14:26 ` Jan Hubicka
2004-08-30 15:03 ` Mark Mitchell
2004-08-30 15:05 ` Jan Hubicka
2004-08-30 17:08 ` Diego Novillo
2004-08-31 3:25 ` Devang Patel
2004-08-30 0:59 Richard Kenner
2004-08-30 4:33 Nathanael Nerode
2004-08-30 10:17 Richard Kenner
2004-08-30 14:48 ` Mark Mitchell
2004-08-30 18:08 ` Mike Stump
2004-08-30 10:44 Richard Kenner
2004-08-30 11:27 ` Laurent GUERBY
2004-08-30 13:05 ` Jakub Jelinek
2004-08-30 18:28 ` Laurent GUERBY
2004-08-30 20:04 ` Jakub Jelinek
2004-08-30 20:25 ` Laurent GUERBY
2004-08-31 5:27 ` Eric Botcazou
2004-08-31 9:42 ` Arnaud Charlet
2004-08-30 20:14 ` Florian Weimer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.61.0408300914100.1957@digraph.polyomino.org.uk \
--to=jsm@polyomino.org.uk \
--cc=dberlin@dberlin.org \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=mark@codesourcery.com \
--cc=pinskia@physics.uc.edu \
--cc=stevenb@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).