Re: Some notes on the Wiki (was: 4.1 news item)

["Joseph S. Myers" <joseph@codesourcery.com>]

On Sun, 10 Jul 2005, Daniel Berlin wrote:

> This happens because
> 1. People don't want to write texinfo, and continually submit patches to
> update the docs little by little (remember, people work on docs the same
> way they do on code.  Most of the time, what they have written is not
> complete yet.  Which is fine for the wiki, but not for our cvs docs, it
> seems), whereas this is trivial with the wiki

Patches for the internals documentation don't need to be complete.  
c-tree.texi and sourcebuild.texi are both clearly marked as incomplete.

> 2. The docs people seem to want to write or use don't fit anywhere in
> our current scheme.

They can just stick a new chapter somewhere vaguely plausible in the 
internals manual - that's what's been done so far.  The structure of the 
internals manual may not be wonderfully coherent, but adding new chapters 
won't make it worse.

> We should be taking what people do and moving it, not saying "you can't
> write it where you want".

This does of course require identifying the authors of all significant 
parts and making sure they have assignments or disclaimers on file at the 
FSF.

-- 
Joseph S. Myers               http://www.srcf.ucam.org/~jsm28/gcc/
    jsm@polyomino.org.uk (personal mail)
    joseph@codesourcery.com (CodeSourcery mail)
    jsm28@gcc.gnu.org (Bugzilla assignments and CCs)