From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20208 invoked by alias); 5 Jun 2009 15:47:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 20196 invoked by uid 22791); 5 Jun 2009 15:47:16 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_20,SPF_FAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx20.gnu.org (HELO mx20.gnu.org) (199.232.41.8) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 05 Jun 2009 15:47:07 +0000 Received: from mail.codesourcery.com ([65.74.133.4]) by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MCbdJ-0002qp-42 for gcc@gcc.gnu.org; Fri, 05 Jun 2009 11:47:05 -0400 Received: (qmail 14635 invoked from network); 5 Jun 2009 15:47:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digraph.polyomino.org.uk) (joseph@127.0.0.2) by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 5 Jun 2009 15:47:03 -0000 Received: from jsm28 (helo=localhost) by digraph.polyomino.org.uk with local-esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MCbdG-0002zm-Vc; Fri, 05 Jun 2009 15:47:02 +0000 Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2009 15:47:00 -0000 From: "Joseph S. Myers" To: Paul Edwards cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: i370 port In-Reply-To: <3E973779D9924C328F8BAD8A1168BA7B@Paullaptop> Message-ID: References: <22637DCC73B54BD1B74D5A5F1939C6AF@Paullaptop> <3E973779D9924C328F8BAD8A1168BA7B@Paullaptop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Detected-Operating-System: by mx20.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-06/txt/msg00106.txt.bz2 On Sat, 6 Jun 2009, Paul Edwards wrote: > > There is no need for the target to be able to run shell scripts or makes. > > You would need to write your own DejaGnu board file that deals with copying > > to/from the i370 system and running programs there. The testsuite routinely > > runs for much more limited embedded systems (using appropriate board files). > > I have a large backlog of work to do with the i370 port already, starting > with getting gcc 3.4.6 running natively. Isn't that a more productive > thing to do? Even after 3.4.6 is done, so that every scrap of code is > available, then there's version 4 to do! It's up to you what priorities you assign to different things involved in getting this on mainline, but we use test results postings as evidence of what sort of state each port is in, where a particular test failure is appearing and whether each port is being used, so there may be reluctance to accept a port that will not have test results posted regularly for mainline. (This is much less of a problem for OS ports than for CPU ports; if one OS for a given CPU has results routinely posted, it doesn't matter so much if other OSes don't, though having results for different OSes is still useful.) -- Joseph S. Myers joseph@codesourcery.com