From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2400 invoked by alias); 5 Jun 2009 20:20:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 2392 invoked by uid 22791); 5 Jun 2009 20:20:25 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_FAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx20.gnu.org (HELO mx20.gnu.org) (199.232.41.8) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 05 Jun 2009 20:20:19 +0000 Received: from mail.codesourcery.com ([65.74.133.4]) by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MCftg-0005S1-Si for gcc@gcc.gnu.org; Fri, 05 Jun 2009 16:20:17 -0400 Received: (qmail 15848 invoked from network); 5 Jun 2009 20:20:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digraph.polyomino.org.uk) (joseph@127.0.0.2) by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 5 Jun 2009 20:20:15 -0000 Received: from jsm28 (helo=localhost) by digraph.polyomino.org.uk with local-esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MCfte-0005UJ-OB; Fri, 05 Jun 2009 20:20:14 +0000 Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2009 20:20:00 -0000 From: "Joseph S. Myers" To: Paul Edwards cc: Daniel Jacobowitz , Ulrich Weigand , gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: i370 port In-Reply-To: <654E603FCD3249F687040C94EB83D171@Paullaptop> Message-ID: References: <200906051520.n55FKg7T016481@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> <69CCB0B6B70141F0BCD2BAFA6DDF314F@Paullaptop> <20090605154849.GA12676@caradoc.them.org> <654E603FCD3249F687040C94EB83D171@Paullaptop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Detected-Operating-System: by mx20.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-06/txt/msg00115.txt.bz2 On Sat, 6 Jun 2009, Paul Edwards wrote: > 3.4.6 made some revamps to the i370 port (compared to 3.2.3), and I > need to make sure those changes have been digested, and no code > has been lost, so that I can pick up the final i370 port and move it. But there were probably also (mechanical) changes to the port between when 3.4 branched (long before 3.4.6 was released) and when the port was removed from trunk - that's why the last revision before it was removed from trunk may be a better starting point. -- Joseph S. Myers joseph@codesourcery.com