From: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph@codesourcery.com>
To: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com>
Cc: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>,
Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>,
Fortran List <fortran@gcc.gnu.org>, FX <fxcoudert@gmail.com>,
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: For testing: full __float128 patch
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 17:34:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1008301646460.23876@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1008301439150.17560@acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at>
On Mon, 30 Aug 2010, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Aug 2010, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> >> Can you please regression test these two patches on freebsd (32 and 64
> >> bit)?
> > Tests running...
>
> Looks like a nice improvement, actually. On both this fixes previously
> existing test failures and adds some passes (no changes on the failure
> side on i386).
>
> From all I can tell, please go ahead, Uros. :-) I wonder whether these
> might also be suitable for GCC 4.5?
Assuming that symbol versioning is enabled on FreeBSD, you need to set
appropriate versions for all the new symbols in libgcc_s - which would be
GCC_4.6.0 for something going on trunk only but GCC_4.5.2 for something
going on 4.5 as well (and with the right %inherit settings in any case).
--
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-30 16:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-30 1:55 Uros Bizjak
2010-08-30 1:59 ` Steve Kargl
2010-08-30 7:42 ` Uros Bizjak
2010-08-30 10:46 ` Gerald Pfeifer
2010-08-30 16:48 ` Gerald Pfeifer
2010-08-30 17:34 ` Joseph S. Myers [this message]
2010-08-30 17:43 ` Uros Bizjak
2010-08-30 18:27 ` Richard Henderson
2010-08-30 19:25 ` Uros Bizjak
2010-08-30 19:38 ` Uros Bizjak
2010-08-30 19:51 ` Richard Henderson
2010-08-30 19:54 ` Jakub Jelinek
2010-08-30 22:29 ` Uros Bizjak
2010-08-31 4:32 ` Steve Kargl
2010-08-31 7:10 ` Steve Kargl
2010-08-31 3:37 ` Joseph S. Myers
2010-08-30 17:37 ` Steve Kargl
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-08-29 0:57 FX
2010-08-29 1:48 ` Steve Kargl
2010-08-29 7:03 ` Steve Kargl
2010-08-29 11:43 ` Steve Kargl
2010-08-29 12:02 ` FX
2010-08-29 20:48 ` Steve Kargl
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.1008301646460.23876@digraph.polyomino.org.uk \
--to=joseph@codesourcery.com \
--cc=fortran@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=fxcoudert@gmail.com \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gerald@pfeifer.com \
--cc=sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu \
--cc=ubizjak@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).