From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30772 invoked by alias); 18 Mar 2011 16:01:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 30763 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Mar 2011 16:01:53 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (HELO fencepost.gnu.org) (140.186.70.10) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 16:01:49 +0000 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:60680) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q0c7X-0002N6-PN for gcc@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 12:01:47 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q0bpt-0006n0-1M for gcc@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 11:43:41 -0400 Received: from mail.codesourcery.com ([38.113.113.100]:34571) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q0bpr-0006kq-7c for gcc@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 11:43:31 -0400 Received: (qmail 27996 invoked from network); 18 Mar 2011 15:43:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digraph.polyomino.org.uk) (joseph@127.0.0.2) by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 18 Mar 2011 15:43:29 -0000 Received: from jsm28 (helo=localhost) by digraph.polyomino.org.uk with local-esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Q0bpn-0007z2-LC; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 15:43:27 +0000 Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 16:01:00 -0000 From: "Joseph S. Myers" To: Diego Novillo cc: Paolo Carlini , gcc@gnu.org, libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Spurious libstdc++ testsuite failures because of truncated buffered output In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <4D837A7B.8020005@oracle.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-Received-From: 38.113.113.100 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-03/txt/msg00268.txt.bz2 On Fri, 18 Mar 2011, Diego Novillo wrote: > I don't really know why the others don't fail, but I will take a look. > In this particular case, the output is truncated after 1,032,134 > bytes are printed. So I can only speculate that no other tests > generate more than this number of bytes in output. I'll take a look. There are a couple of places in DejaGnu's remote.exp that compare numbers of bytes with 512000; try increasing those to a much bigger figure, say 5120000. -- Joseph S. Myers joseph@codesourcery.com