From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15407 invoked by alias); 20 Dec 2013 12:42:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 15396 invoked by uid 89); 20 Dec 2013 12:42:59 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: relay1.mentorg.com Received: from relay1.mentorg.com (HELO relay1.mentorg.com) (192.94.38.131) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 Dec 2013 12:42:58 +0000 Received: from svr-orw-exc-10.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.98.58]) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp id 1VtzPp-0001ae-OC from joseph_myers@mentor.com ; Fri, 20 Dec 2013 04:42:53 -0800 Received: from SVR-IES-FEM-02.mgc.mentorg.com ([137.202.0.106]) by SVR-ORW-EXC-10.mgc.mentorg.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Fri, 20 Dec 2013 04:42:53 -0800 Received: from digraph.polyomino.org.uk (137.202.0.76) by SVR-IES-FEM-02.mgc.mentorg.com (137.202.0.106) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.247.3; Fri, 20 Dec 2013 12:42:51 +0000 Received: from jsm28 (helo=localhost) by digraph.polyomino.org.uk with local-esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1VtzPm-0000XM-Ca; Fri, 20 Dec 2013 12:42:50 +0000 Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 12:42:00 -0000 From: "Joseph S. Myers" To: DJ Delorie CC: , Subject: Re: proposal to make SIZE_TYPE more flexible In-Reply-To: <201312200458.rBK4wp7Y012116@greed.delorie.com> Message-ID: References: <201310300422.r9U4M6Mx002568@greed.delorie.com> <201311140158.rAE1wCkg006136@greed.delorie.com> <201311152338.rAFNc9CJ007961@greed.delorie.com> <201311212241.rALMf15B028014@greed.delorie.com> <201311220828.rAM8Ss0q011135@greed.delorie.com> <201311221933.rAMJXDUt031382@greed.delorie.com> <201311222118.rAMLIxag003002@greed.delorie.com> <201312100334.rBA3YwMq017441@greed.delorie.com> <201312200458.rBK4wp7Y012116@greed.delorie.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-SW-Source: 2013-12/txt/msg00202.txt.bz2 On Thu, 19 Dec 2013, DJ Delorie wrote: > Where is the right place to set the array of "this __intN mode is > enabled" flags? I initially set it in tree.c where __int128 is set > up, but that happens *after* c_parse_init() needs the flag to set up > the RID_* keywords for them. Maybe immediately after the call to init_adjust_machine_modes from do_compile? (It can't actually be inside backend_init, since it needs to happen even if just preprocessing - whether __SIZEOF_INT128__ gets defined depends on __int128 availability, and presumably you'll have such __SIZEOF_INT__ macros for whichever such types are available - in which case no_backend is true.) -- Joseph S. Myers joseph@codesourcery.com