From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Benjamin Kosnik To: Mark Mitchell Cc: geoffk@redhat.com, geoffk@geoffk.org, gcc@gcc.gnu.org, libstdc++@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Removal of V2 code Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2000 12:20:00 -0000 Message-id: References: <20001121105613T.mitchell@codesourcery.com> X-SW-Source: 2000-11/msg00957.html > The rumors of V2 not working with newlib were greatly exaggerated. Err. I think you mean the rumors of V3 working with newlib have been greatly exaggerated. As a matter of fact, it's been working since about Feb. I did a cross x86-x-powerpc-elf this Sunday, as a matter of fact, and it worked well. > I made absolutely no changes to the source code or configury bits. ...as none should be needed. > There was also one configury oddity in the V3 directory: > > /nfs/gandalf/u2/mitchell/dev/powerpc-test/cvs-objs/gcc/egcs/libstdc++-v3/configure: test: =: unary operator expected > > This comes from: > > AC_DEFUN(AC_LC_MESSAGES, > [if test $ac_cv_header_locale_h = yes; then > AC_CACHE_CHECK([for LC_MESSAGES], ac_cv_val_LC_MESSAGES, > > when $ac_cv_header_locale_h is not yet set. I think that the V3 > configury bits should check for first. Would a V3 person > please confirm that, and make the necessary change? I'll fix this. > Even without this change, however, the configuration completed, > built the library, and mostly worked. ... this has been my experience as well. Nice to see it confirmed. -benjamin