From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8485 invoked by alias); 10 Apr 2002 18:21:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 8446 invoked from network); 10 Apr 2002 18:21:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO cygnus.com) (205.180.230.5) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 10 Apr 2002 18:21:30 -0000 Received: from taarna.cygnus.com (taarna.sfbay.redhat.com [205.180.230.102]) by runyon.cygnus.com (8.8.7-cygnus/8.8.7) with ESMTP id LAA13862; Wed, 10 Apr 2002 11:21:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: (bkoz@localhost) by taarna.cygnus.com (SMI-8.6/8.6.4) id LAA00699; Wed, 10 Apr 2002 11:21:15 -0700 Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 11:39:00 -0000 From: Benjamin Kosnik X-Sender: bkoz@taarna.cygnus.com To: Mark Mitchell cc: Joe Buck , Phil Edwards , "gcc@gcc.gnu.org" , gdr@codesourcery.com Subject: Re: GCC 3.1 Release In-Reply-To: <550276201.1018457525@VAIO> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg00403.txt.bz2 > I think your patch makes sense. Benjamin what do you think? Seems fine. I'm interested in seeing a complete patch. Perhaps somebody could take Joe's sketched solution and make it complete, and add a testcase? I'm in the middle of other issues, so I can't be more hands-on on this, sorry. -benjamin