From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Roman Lechtchinsky <rl@cs.tu-berlin.de>
To: Manfred Hollstein <manfred.h@gmx.net>
Cc: Franz Sirl <Franz.Sirl-kernel@lauterbach.com>, gcc@gcc.gnu.org, schwab@suse.de
Subject: Re: Getting rid of -g
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2001 01:08:00 -0000
Message-id: <Pine.SOL.4.10.10109130959001.15733-100000@sossusvlei>
References: <3B9F8297.90504901@gmx.net>
X-SW-Source: 2001-09/msg00498.html

On Wed, 12 Sep 2001, Manfred Hollstein wrote:
> The only package which is compiled using plain cc is libiberty,
> all other packages will be built using gcc, so there should be no
> need to avoid using '-g' for those packages. Regarding libiberty,
> you should create a similar config file in the libiberty/config
> directory and put suitable code into libiberty/config.table.

Nope, this doesn't work because both CFLAGS and LIBCFLAGS (it's the latter
which is actually used for compiling libiberty) are overridden by the
top-level makefile. I've added a Unicos-specific config file to the
top-level config directory and set host_makefile_frag in configure.in
appropriately. This seems to work but is this really the right way to do
it? Should I additionally do what you suggest to ensure that the correct
flags are passed if libiberty is built separately?

Bye

Roman