From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-116460-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 11152 invoked by alias); 28 Jun 2005 18:38:52 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 10707 invoked by uid 22791); 28 Jun 2005 18:38:43 -0000
Received: from host217-40-213-68.in-addr.btopenworld.com (HELO SERRANO.CAM.ARTIMI.COM) (217.40.213.68)
    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jun 2005 18:38:43 +0000
Received: from mace ([192.168.1.25]) by SERRANO.CAM.ARTIMI.COM with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211);
	 Tue, 28 Jun 2005 19:38:42 +0100
From: "Dave Korn" <dave.korn@artimi.com>
To: "'Olivier Galibert'" <galibert@pobox.com>,
	"'Joe Buck'" <Joe.Buck@synopsys.COM>
Cc: "'Andrew Haley'" <aph@redhat.com>,
	"'Robert Dewar'" <dewar@adacore.com>,
	"'Gabriel Dos Reis'" <gdr@integrable-solutions.net>,
	"'Andrew Pinski'" <pinskia@physics.uc.edu>,
	"'gcc mailing list'" <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: RE: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC)
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 18:38:00 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In-Reply-To: <20050628182832.GH52889@dspnet.fr.eu.org>
Message-ID: <SERRANOOh3ybrJLbZLK00000278@SERRANO.CAM.ARTIMI.COM>
X-SW-Source: 2005-06/txt/msg01171.txt.bz2

----Original Message----
>From: Olivier Galibert
>Sent: 28 June 2005 19:29

> Incidentally, gcc itself makes most of these assumptions in its own
> code.  I kinda doubt you can run it on a dsp or a machine with 16-bits
> ints.  Which is different than generating code for them.

  They aren't assumptions in GCC, they are *very clearly documented
requirements* for GCC host platforms.

   cheers,
      DaveK
-- 
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....