From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <mark@klomp.org>
Received: from gnu.wildebeest.org (wildebeest.demon.nl [212.238.236.112])
 by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6FDB0383580A
 for <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>; Wed,  2 Jun 2021 08:17:31 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 6FDB0383580A
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org;
 dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=klomp.org
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=klomp.org
Received: from reform (deer0x0b.wildebeest.org [172.31.17.141])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by gnu.wildebeest.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9A9D8302BBED;
 Wed,  2 Jun 2021 10:17:25 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by reform (Postfix, from userid 1000)
 id 316402E82FEA; Wed,  2 Jun 2021 10:17:25 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2021 10:17:25 +0200
From: Mark Wielaard <mark@klomp.org>
To: Thomas Rodgers <rodgert@appliantology.com>
Cc: GCC Development <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Update to GCC copyright assignment policy
Message-ID: <YLc+lcdzaOiUEGMT@wildebeest.org>
References: <CAGWvnyme6cQUGb+G4=tesNYqLYBSGnDYb95LH2zVUgxovHU7kw@mail.gmail.com>
 <f1ebb13392489c87908e019a263cc9f5280b511c.camel@klomp.org>
 <078c1f4c6f7673a05375bbf81ae16e39@appliantology.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <078c1f4c6f7673a05375bbf81ae16e39@appliantology.com>
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS,
 SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on
 server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc mailing list <gcc.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc>,
 <mailto:gcc-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc>,
 <mailto:gcc-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2021 08:17:42 -0000

Hi Thomas,

On Tue, Jun 01, 2021 at 12:58:12PM -0700, Thomas Rodgers wrote:
> On 2021-06-01 07:28, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > If we no longer want the FSF to be the legal guardian and copyright
> > holder for GCC could we please find another legal entity that performs
> > that role and helps us as a project with copyleft compliance?
> 
> Personally, this would have been my preference.
> 
> > I would be happy to setup a shared copyright pool under the Conservancy
> > Copyleft Compliance project for example:
> > https://sfconservancy.org/copyleft-compliance/

It isn't too late to start discussing this as alternative. As far as I
understand the SC hasn't talked to the Conservancy yet. But the
Conservancy is happy to share their knowledge and discuss policy
issues with the GCC community if we decide we want their input.

Cheers,

Mark