From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B988E3857C66 for ; Mon, 14 Jun 2021 11:37:02 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org B988E3857C66 Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-232-f9XnRDytNGS5rVLIM2ItNg-1; Mon, 14 Jun 2021 07:37:01 -0400 X-MC-Unique: f9XnRDytNGS5rVLIM2ItNg-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx07.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 32DDD100CECE; Mon, 14 Jun 2021 11:37:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (unknown [10.33.36.175]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6ECB10023B0; Mon, 14 Jun 2021 11:36:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2021 12:36:58 +0100 From: Jonathan Wakely To: psmith@gnu.org Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] libstdc++: Count pretty-printed tuple elements from 0 not 1 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.22 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, KAM_NUMSUBJECT, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gcc@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2021 11:37:03 -0000 Patches need go to gcc-patches@ not gcc@ (and libstdc++ patches need to be CC'd to libstdc++@ as well).