From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (troutmask.apl.washington.edu
 [128.95.76.21])
 by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 82D423858D28
 for <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>; Tue, 12 Apr 2022 18:03:40 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 82D423858D28
Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPS id 23CI3dR0033491
 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO);
 Tue, 12 Apr 2022 11:03:39 -0700 (PDT)
 (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu)
Received: (from sgk@localhost)
 by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.16.1/8.16.1/Submit) id 23CI3dic033490;
 Tue, 12 Apr 2022 11:03:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sgk)
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2022 11:03:39 -0700
From: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
To: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@gmail.com>
Cc: Richard Biener <richard.guenther@gmail.com>,
 GCC Development <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: testsuite requires LTO?
Message-ID: <YlW++8xm/bkgYSmT@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
Reply-To: sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu
References: <YlS/C6QHm7Y4v/Il@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
 <CAFiYyc2SsnpaCO29PgkJHPptBz6ZAPxV6z5sXR92ObP1cNu-Cg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAFiYyc1aEGWgoKQpACVL2HUhev7f-SmVJ0apW6qsC4qyXoDZhg@mail.gmail.com>
 <YlW3T/cKIc5cjurm@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
 <CAH6eHdQKunKjiXaGjdvO1O+9t6N445UVtRGsBFqYGcjFvoWc4A@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAH6eHdQKunKjiXaGjdvO1O+9t6N445UVtRGsBFqYGcjFvoWc4A@mail.gmail.com>
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS,
 KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE, TXREP,
 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on
 server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc mailing list <gcc.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc>,
 <mailto:gcc-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc>,
 <mailto:gcc-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2022 18:03:42 -0000

On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 06:42:20PM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Apr 2022 at 18:32, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > Well, I determined what the problem is.  On FreeBSD,
> > GNU make is gmake.  make(1) on FreeBSD is BSD make.
> >
> > % gmake -j7 check-c
> >
> > Does not pass down the name of the invoking command
> > to sub-make jobs.
> 
> That suggests some makefile is using 'make' directly, not using
> $(MAKE). But if that was the case, then setting MAKE in the
> environment wouldn't help either.
> 
> What version of gmake do you have?

% gmake --version
GNU Make 4.3
Built for amd64-portbld-freebsd13.0

It's the version from FreeBSD port collection.

I just started a new bootstrap with LTO enabled
without any patches in my gcc tree to try to get
a baseline.  It will take a bit.

-- 
Steve