public inbox for gcc@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
To: Iain Sandoe <idsandoe@googlemail.com>
Cc: GCC Development <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>, David Malcolm <dmalcolm@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: GCC 12.1 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org
Date: Sun, 1 May 2022 13:41:01 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Ym5xzRFKr35FIFjl@tucnak> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BC3318BA-D91C-4357-9015-1538A112807A@googlemail.com>

On Sun, May 01, 2022 at 11:02:29AM +0100, Iain Sandoe wrote:
> All of these show new fails (presumably because checking is off):
> 
> XPASS: c-c++-common/goacc/kernels-decompose-pr100400-1-2.c  -std=c++98 (internal compiler error)
> FAIL: c-c++-common/goacc/kernels-decompose-pr100400-1-2.c  -std=c++98 (test for excess errors)
> XPASS: c-c++-common/goacc/kernels-decompose-pr100400-1-2.c  -std=c++14 (internal compiler error)
> FAIL: c-c++-common/goacc/kernels-decompose-pr100400-1-2.c  -std=c++14 (test for excess errors)
> XPASS: c-c++-common/goacc/kernels-decompose-pr100400-1-2.c  -std=c++17 (internal compiler error)
> FAIL: c-c++-common/goacc/kernels-decompose-pr100400-1-2.c  -std=c++17 (test for excess errors)
> XPASS: c-c++-common/goacc/kernels-decompose-pr100400-1-2.c  -std=c++20 (internal compiler error)
> FAIL: c-c++-common/goacc/kernels-decompose-pr100400-1-2.c  -std=c++20 (test for excess errors)

We can live with that for 12.1.

> earlier x86 darwin is particularly noisy test-wise because there seem to be a lot of newer AVX512 tests
> that do not check for support from the assembler etc.

That would be nice to fix for 12.2, can you file a PR with a list?

> However from Darwin12+ (macOS 10.8) we expect to be able to bootstrap with the host clang, but:
> 
> Not OK:
> x86_64-darwin{12..15} FAIL to bootstrap with host clang, this is a regression.
> 
> the reason is that "gcc/analyzer/region-model.cc” uses initializer_lists, and it seems that <initializer_list>
> is not transitively included by any used headers for _LIBCPP_VERSION < 4000.  I fixed that locally by
> adding initializer_list into system.h (and adding INCLUDE_INITIALIZER_LIST to the top of 
> gcc/analyzer/region-model.cc)
> - with that change those versions do bootstrap and test OK***

From what I can see, with libstdc++ it works because <utility> which is
included by system.h includes <initializer_list>.
If I rename initializer_list in analyzer/region-model.ii to initializer_listx, I
also get:
../../gcc/analyzer/region-model.cc: In function ‘void ana::selftest::test_binop_svalue_folding()’:
../../gcc/analyzer/region-model.cc:4966:48: error: deducing from brace-enclosed initializer list requires ‘#include <initializer_list>’
 4508 | 
  +++ |+#include <initializer_list>
 4509 | static void
......
 4966 |     for (auto op : {BIT_IOR_EXPR, TRUTH_OR_EXPR})
      |                                                ^
../../gcc/analyzer/region-model.cc:4978:49: error: deducing from brace-enclosed initializer list requires ‘#include <initializer_list>’
 4978 |     for (auto op : {BIT_AND_EXPR, TRUTH_AND_EXPR})
      |                                                 ^

I think we have 2 options, one is do what you wrote above,
INCLUDE_INITIALIZER_LIST defined before system.h to get #include <initializer_list>.
The other option is just to include that unconditionally, it is a very small
header.  For libstdc++ it will make no difference as it is included anyway
and the header is really small there, libc++ includes <cstddef> which isn't
normally included and system.h includes <stddef.h> instead.

	Jakub


  reply	other threads:[~2022-05-01 11:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-29 14:34 Jakub Jelinek
2022-05-01 10:02 ` Iain Sandoe
2022-05-01 11:41   ` Jakub Jelinek [this message]
2022-05-01 15:38     ` Richard Biener
2022-05-01 18:06       ` Jonathan Wakely
2022-05-02 11:49 ` Boris Kolpackov
2022-05-02 12:26   ` Marc Glisse
2022-05-02 15:42     ` Jonathan Wakely

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Ym5xzRFKr35FIFjl@tucnak \
    --to=jakub@redhat.com \
    --cc=dmalcolm@redhat.com \
    --cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=idsandoe@googlemail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).