From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from scc-mailout-kit-02.scc.kit.edu (scc-mailout-kit-02.scc.kit.edu [IPv6:2a00:1398:9:f712::810d:e752]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4695D3858418 for ; Sat, 3 Sep 2022 13:29:18 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 4695D3858418 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=usta.de Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=usta.de Received: from hekate.asta.kit.edu ([2a00:1398:5:f401::77]) by scc-mailout-kit-02.scc.kit.edu with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_SECP256R1__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256) (envelope-from ) id 1oUTD2-007E4k-HU; Sat, 03 Sep 2022 15:29:16 +0200 Received: from login-1.asta.kit.edu ([2a00:1398:5:f400::72]) by hekate.asta.kit.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1oUTD1-007rTi-Cg; Sat, 03 Sep 2022 15:29:15 +0200 Received: from schwarze by login-1.asta.kit.edu with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oUTD1-0001KK-BO; Sat, 03 Sep 2022 15:29:15 +0200 Date: Sat, 3 Sep 2022 15:29:15 +0200 From: Ingo Schwarze To: alx.manpages@gmail.com Cc: Martin Uecker , Alejandro Colomar , JeanHeyd Meneide , linux-man@vger.kernel.org, gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Various pages: SYNOPSIS: Use VLA syntax in function parameters Message-ID: References: <20220826210710.35237-1-alx.manpages@gmail.com> <89d79095-d1cd-ab2b-00e4-caa31126751e@gmail.com> <5ba53bad-019e-8a94-d61e-85b2f13223a9@gmail.com> <491a930d-47eb-7c86-c0c4-25eef4ac0be0@gmail.com> <2abccaa2-d472-4c5b-aea6-7a2dddd665da@gmail.com> <4475b350c2a4d60da540c0f3055f466640e6c409.camel@tugraz.at> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4475b350c2a4d60da540c0f3055f466640e6c409.camel@tugraz.at> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KAM_DMARC_STATUS,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: Hi, the only point i strongly care about is this one: Manual pages should not use * non-standard syntax * non-portable syntax * ambiguous syntax (i.e. syntax that might have different meanings with different compilers or in different contexts) * syntax that might be invalid or dangerous with some widely used compiler collections like GCC or LLVM Regarding the discussions about standardization and extensions, all proposals i have seen look seriously ugly and awkward to me, and i'm not yet convinced such ugliness is sufficiently offset by the relatively minor benefit that is apparent to me right now. Yours, Ingo -- Ingo Schwarze http://www.openbsd.org/ http://mandoc.bsd.lv/