From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18966 invoked by alias); 19 Nov 2004 00:57:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 18924 invoked from network); 19 Nov 2004 00:57:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO wproxy.gmail.com) (64.233.184.205) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 19 Nov 2004 00:57:41 -0000 Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 68so13058wra for ; Thu, 18 Nov 2004 16:57:41 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.45.5 with SMTP id s5mr577715wrs; Thu, 18 Nov 2004 16:57:40 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.11.31 with HTTP; Thu, 18 Nov 2004 16:57:40 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 01:26:00 -0000 From: Rogelio Serrano Reply-To: Rogelio Serrano To: Ziemowit Laski Subject: Re: Is ObjC++ still in time for 4.0? Cc: gcc mailing list , Mike Stump , GNUStep In-Reply-To: <3D92B030-39C3-11D9-8317-00039390FFE2@apple.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <442C1616-387F-11D9-9815-0030654C2998@hamburg.de> <3D92B030-39C3-11D9-8317-00039390FFE2@apple.com> X-SW-Source: 2004-11/txt/msg00659.txt.bz2 [snipped...] > So, the current status is: > (a) Geoff has refused to provide an acceptable design; > (b) Geoff has objected to all other designs presented. > > --Zem [snipped...] Well i can live with patches to mainline gcc. Maybe i can start tesing gcc-improvements-branch again.