public inbox for gcc@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Martin Uecker <ma.uecker@gmail.com>
To: prathamesh.kulkarni@linaro.org
Cc: "gcc@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Adding a new attribute to function param to mark it as constant
Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2021 22:10:53 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ac18dfef60ddb4392d834a2280a6ccf123d00736.camel@gmail.com> (raw)

> On Wed, 4 Aug 2021 at 03:27, Segher Boessenkool
> <segher@kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hi!
> >
> > On Fri, Jul 23, 2021 at 04:23:42PM +0530, Prathamesh Kulkarni via Gcc wrote:
> > > The constraint here is that, vshl_n<type> intrinsics require that the
> > > second arg (__b),
> > > should be an immediate value.
> >
> > Something that matches the "n" constraint, not necessarily a literal,
> > but stricter than just "immediate".  It probably is a good idea to allow
> > only "integer constant expression"s, so that the validity of the source
> > code does not depend on what the optimisers do with the code.
> >
> > > As Richard suggested, sth like:
> > > void foo(int x __attribute__((literal_constant (min_val, max_val)));
> >
> > The Linux kernel has a macro __is_constexpr to test if something is an
> > integer constant expression, see <linux/const.h> .  That is a much
> > better idea imo.  There could be a builtin for that of course, but an
> > attribute is less powerful, less usable, less useful.
> Hi Segher,
> Thanks for the suggestions. I am not sure tho if we could use a macro
> similar to __is_constexpr
> to check if parameter is constant inside an inline function (which is
> the case for intrinsics) ?
> 
> For eg:
> #define __is_constexpr(x) \
>         (sizeof(int) == sizeof(*(8 ? ((void *)((long)(x) * 0l)) : (int *)8)))
> 
> inline int foo(const int x)
> {
>   _Static_assert (__is_constexpr (x));
>   return x;
> }
> 
> int main()
> {
>   return foo (1);
> }
> 
> results in:
> foo.c: In function ‘foo’:
> foo.c:8:3: error: static assertion failed
>     8 |   _Static_assert (__is_constexpr (x));
> 
> Initially we tried to use __Static_assert (__builtin_constant_p (arg))
> for the same purpose but that did not work
> because while parsing the intrinsic function, the FE cannot determine
> if the arg is indeed a constant.
> I guess the static assertion or __is_constexpr would work only if the
> intrinsic were defined as a macro instead of an inline function ?
> Or am I misunderstanding ?

You have to use it at the call site:

#define __is_constexpr(x) \
         (sizeof(int) == sizeof(*(8 ? ((void *)((long)(x) * 0l)) : (int *)8)))

#define foo(x) foo(({ _Static_assert(__is_constexpr(x), "no ICE"); (x); }))

inline int (foo)(const int x)
{
  return x;
}

int main()
{
  foo(1);
  int n = 1;
  foo(n);	// error
}


--Martin



             reply	other threads:[~2021-08-06 20:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-06 20:10 Martin Uecker [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-07-23 10:53 Prathamesh Kulkarni
2021-07-23 17:59 ` Andrew Pinski
2021-07-26  9:04   ` Prathamesh Kulkarni
2021-07-27  8:19     ` Richard Biener
2021-08-03 10:11       ` Prathamesh Kulkarni
2021-08-03 10:13         ` Prathamesh Kulkarni
2021-08-03 17:44         ` Martin Sebor
2021-08-04  9:46           ` Richard Earnshaw
2021-08-06  0:06             ` Martin Sebor
2021-08-06 10:51               ` Richard Earnshaw
2021-08-06 20:39                 ` Martin Sebor
2021-08-12  8:32                   ` Prathamesh Kulkarni
2021-08-13 17:14                     ` Martin Sebor
2021-08-18  6:52                       ` Prathamesh Kulkarni
2021-08-18 14:40                         ` Martin Sebor
2021-08-19  8:10                           ` Prathamesh Kulkarni
2021-08-03 21:55 ` Segher Boessenkool
2021-08-04  9:50   ` Prathamesh Kulkarni
2021-08-04 10:17     ` Segher Boessenkool
2021-08-04 11:50       ` Prathamesh Kulkarni
2021-08-04 12:46         ` Segher Boessenkool
2021-08-04 13:00           ` Richard Earnshaw
2021-08-04 13:40             ` Segher Boessenkool
2021-08-04 14:27               ` Richard Earnshaw
2021-08-04 16:16                 ` Segher Boessenkool
2021-08-04 17:08                   ` Florian Weimer
2021-08-04 17:59                     ` Segher Boessenkool
2021-08-05  9:32                       ` Richard Earnshaw
2021-08-05  9:01             ` Prathamesh Kulkarni
2021-08-05 15:06               ` Segher Boessenkool

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ac18dfef60ddb4392d834a2280a6ccf123d00736.camel@gmail.com \
    --to=ma.uecker@gmail.com \
    --cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=prathamesh.kulkarni@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).