From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 99751 invoked by alias); 23 May 2019 16:45:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 99517 invoked by uid 89); 23 May 2019 16:45:13 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=H*f:sk:56afc1d, H*f:sk:9c85ce7, c2x, C2X X-HELO: relay1.mentorg.com Received: from relay1.mentorg.com (HELO relay1.mentorg.com) (192.94.38.131) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 May 2019 16:45:03 +0000 Received: from nat-ies.mentorg.com ([192.94.31.2] helo=svr-ies-mbx-01.mgc.mentorg.com) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384:256) id 1hTqpw-0006Px-UG from joseph_myers@mentor.com ; Thu, 23 May 2019 09:45:00 -0700 Received: from digraph.polyomino.org.uk (137.202.0.90) by svr-ies-mbx-01.mgc.mentorg.com (139.181.222.1) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Thu, 23 May 2019 17:44:57 +0100 Received: from jsm28 (helo=localhost) by digraph.polyomino.org.uk with local-esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1hTqps-0004CS-Uw; Thu, 23 May 2019 16:44:56 +0000 Date: Thu, 23 May 2019 16:45:00 -0000 From: Joseph Myers To: Martin Sebor CC: "Richard Earnshaw (lists)" , Bill Schmidt , Subject: Re: -Wformat-diag: floating-point or floating point? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <5ddd8f0f-e2f0-62f2-ae38-c860398cb4bb@gmail.com> <0c874cf4-4f78-f439-4546-942f8855bf63@linux.ibm.com> <56afc1d8-058d-0086-291a-3fccda08be25@arm.com> <9c85ce74-1459-094d-0c6b-3fcffb0e7f4f@linux.ibm.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (DEB 202 2017-01-01) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-SW-Source: 2019-05/txt/msg00202.txt.bz2 On Wed, 22 May 2019, Martin Sebor wrote: > ISO C does not support decimal floating point And as a tangential point, that's not accurate for C2X, where DFP is an optional standard feature, but it's probably reasonable to keep the diagnostic saying "ISO C does not support" under its existing conditions until someone actually reviews and updates the DFP support for the differences between the old TR 24732:2009 and the newer TS 18661-2 / C2X version (not sure how big those differences are, but not much has changed in the DFP support in GCC lately). -- Joseph S. Myers joseph@codesourcery.com