From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 109345 invoked by alias); 24 Sep 2019 22:15:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 109312 invoked by uid 89); 24 Sep 2019 22:15:47 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=sophisticated, price, pay X-HELO: esa2.mentor.iphmx.com Received: from esa2.mentor.iphmx.com (HELO esa2.mentor.iphmx.com) (68.232.141.98) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 22:15:36 +0000 IronPort-SDR: XQ+6pWONEm3x7lXK6rWgb/aMh7DxsMJtapC/MMQ232MBDSbP1896U7izZHRQuYh1eRxYdSb1Cj 22zmAhd2iCr2rwAQNVPqj3gySUzPO4FVNTIgHJlxr0ByOeLM+iBBy/HAqiXBMp1IJCMm/qrjvu N31eOUshD2+qgkByEH65Q49iWqHgkICXxGyrb1wPNx1CUIlVHoGe5ME5GAe7cW9eTHN6qHtg0D Ccq3yDhkcaIS0mWqNvUpw3dEi8W6Krv5Mqka2b9UwGxB8ExvSsftPE9AL5v375k5qtMVqPYD6X ZIE= Received: from orw-gwy-02-in.mentorg.com ([192.94.38.167]) by esa2.mentor.iphmx.com with ESMTP; 24 Sep 2019 14:15:33 -0800 IronPort-SDR: Bi24w0BP7JvMCv8IVTJ5icdtbr6zHx2eR4MoNPol6VyrVWYglJCttmAJIATDvJmDCEXPm2RawB aAMO+QgCxSjO9/oVPA2tq7IbL19Fx/IhYooeRyn8zWoWQbwsh1JZ7Wb3G7d5xmIIV++xHQ9s9D Pn78ZOS0hGWfE1w0leh5Z/4m90Uon1mCiPR725r+lxXsQ9YL7mVV6qFQZ4KMUxjGlvutFP4kgb ii0eO+oKNfonmMESS4CHu2pf7nCVRl+QDfozgGTo9ZH0xyUojsXo4MZY2/bODazWqX7hoRBPe/ ilE= Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2019 22:15:00 -0000 From: Joseph Myers To: Jonathan Wakely CC: "gcc@gcc.gnu.org" Subject: Re: git conversion of GCC wwwdocs repository In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (DEB 202 2017-01-01) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Return-Path: joseph@codesourcery.com X-SW-Source: 2019-09/txt/msg00216.txt.bz2 On Tue, 24 Sep 2019, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On Tue, 24 Sep 2019 at 21:46, Joseph Myers wrote: > > > > Would anyone like to make any comments on this conversion from CVS to git? > > It looks pretty good. I note that the author map just uses the > committer's current email address, meaning I have commits using my > @redhat.com address nearly a decade before I started working at Red > Hat. But that's a small price to pay for moving from CVS to Git in my > opinion. And t's arguably correct to have all my commits under one > identity rather than several different ones anyway. If people prefer to use @gcc.gnu.org addresses, that's a small matter of adjusting the postprocessing of the author map from the gcc-conversion repository to replace the addresses there with username@gcc.gnu.org while keeping the names from that author map. (The postprocessing is needed anyway for this conversion because cvs-fast-export uses a more restricted author map syntax than reposurgeon does. Because there is no ChangeLog in wwwdocs, more sophisticated systems for identifying the relevant email address for each commit from the ChangeLog aren't practical the same way they are for the main GCC repository.) -- Joseph S. Myers joseph@codesourcery.com