From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 76574 invoked by alias); 10 Jan 2020 15:16:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 75895 invoked by uid 89); 10 Jan 2020 15:16:08 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=H*i:sk:2CC0AB7, H*f:sk:2CC0AB7, HX-Languages-Length:572, H*MI:sk:2CC0AB7 X-HELO: esa3.mentor.iphmx.com Received: from esa3.mentor.iphmx.com (HELO esa3.mentor.iphmx.com) (68.232.137.180) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jan 2020 15:16:05 +0000 IronPort-SDR: 4l9+nrIjf7wH81Idm1vfgnEanG0LfE/XnFRme+ee3DyptRHDP4rWLdYCamNEzMNFWHEVa3SoIU pMjR3okSkI8dpRsV4SnVY50T0FyRRaK+7iWsSLQ0jh/bKDhSh96AYnvT9LF4j7Ou9oG5VPVQF2 0lJ3XHAR18jPLmHRAj6Vxx8GYtpodB2gAlXfkLW78hIKxSTGArBjjMPoLloDsO6I7AOppY9GAZ GG3ns8t6KTcmjYCaPpslTGu3FZ6fc42YF1D4oYDyxKcdUdpf7I8aDVpRTAvodG1aB9tYLlwoEU YMI= Received: from orw-gwy-02-in.mentorg.com ([192.94.38.167]) by esa3.mentor.iphmx.com with ESMTP; 10 Jan 2020 07:16:03 -0800 IronPort-SDR: VLp66UQWWvEgAjiwh4DjO7SaJbWsUKkRpOljshK3P5G5TcoNGU8pytuGBNVL4Lk171h4wPoUTi 7D+R7o8F4fKJHYtU2iweuAnynmoOJdaGHa5d2h2EE7W9gbldRd00hac4f307+u5lx3Qet3Knbx +S3kh9lff79uG9kksgMt7svHp8oG1HIfbpgkbZuP+X+XSJ+RA60GUJ9RuC4rNiHv3HPb8WCG0l 87e6p0LP2lN4OlECJC59yyFC+il/eWLIHa8MUNqrSbMpK8A3X7F5yDH+K35s0fFST69x2HUQ3C pOc= Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2020 15:16:00 -0000 From: Joseph Myers To: Maxim Kuvyrkov CC: GCC Development , "Eric S. Raymond" , "Richard Earnshaw (lists)" , Alexandre Oliva , Jeff Law , Mark Wielaard , Jakub Jelinek , Segher Boessenkool Subject: Re: Proposal for the transition timetable for the move to GIT In-Reply-To: <2CC0AB76-884F-4148-817F-196796B46B9E@linaro.org> Message-ID: References: <5DCEA32B-3E36-4400-B931-9F4E2A8F3FA5@linaro.org> <155B5BFD-6ECF-4EBF-A38C-D6DD178FB497@linaro.org> <2b6330f2-1a00-ac89-fd3c-4b70e5454f4b@arm.com> <9B71A0F7-CD93-4636-BFC7-1D1DBC040F07@linaro.org> <6EE7BD53-6677-49D2-BCDD-56CD7DA855E9@linaro.org> <88B4DAF3-33C1-445F-8F5A-809D5463D0F9@linaro.org> <20200108221119.GA94728@thyrsus.com> <20200109023804.GR3191@gate.crashing.org> <27A7DEAB-42B9-4A5A-BE89-618F7ED2347E@linaro.org> <2CC0AB76-884F-4148-817F-196796B46B9E@linaro.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (DEB 202 2017-01-01) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Return-Path: joseph@codesourcery.com X-SW-Source: 2020-01/txt/msg00122.txt.bz2 On Fri, 10 Jan 2020, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote: > To me this looks like cherry-picks of r182541 and r182547 from > redhat/gcc-4_7-branch into redhat/gcc-4_8-branch. r182541 is the first commit on /branches/redhat/gcc-4_7-branch after it was created as a copy of trunk. I.e., merging and cherry-picking it are indistinguishable, and it's entirely correct for reposurgeon to consider a commit merging it as a merge from r182541 (together with a cherry-pick of r182547). -- Joseph S. Myers joseph@codesourcery.com