public inbox for gcc@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com>
To: Michael Matz <matz@suse.de>
Cc: "Richard Earnshaw (lists)" <Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com>,
	Segher Boessenkool	<segher@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Alexander Monakov <amonakov@ispras.ru>,
	Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com>, <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
	GCC Development	<gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH, v3] wwwdocs: e-mail subject lines for contributions
Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2020 18:03:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.2002031801230.5638@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LSU.2.21.2002031741040.12763@wotan.suse.de>

On Mon, 3 Feb 2020, Michael Matz wrote:

> I understand that, but the subject line of this thread says "e-mail 
> subject lines", so I thought we were talking about, well, exactly that; 
> and I see no value of these tags in e-mails either.

I agree that [PATCH] is not useful (and in general, anything in the 
subject line before the actual meaningful commit summary should be as 
short as possible).  [RFC] might be useful, but not [PATCH].

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-02-03 18:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <c3928f40-2d71-fb5b-f2e0-3878ac88a2b7@arm.com>
     [not found] ` <alpine.LSU.2.21.2001191425160.739@anthias.pfeifer.com>
     [not found]   ` <353faf3e-bf43-eb4d-542d-45a53dce77b2@arm.com>
2020-01-21 15:40     ` [PATCH, v2] " Richard Earnshaw (lists)
2020-01-21 16:03       ` Jakub Jelinek
2020-01-21 16:14         ` Richard Earnshaw (lists)
2020-01-21 16:38           ` Jakub Jelinek
2020-01-21 16:43             ` Richard Earnshaw (lists)
2020-01-21 19:27               ` Jason Merrill
2020-01-22  3:46                 ` Richard Earnshaw (lists)
2020-01-22 10:00                   ` Jakub Jelinek
2020-01-22 13:50                     ` Richard Earnshaw (lists)
2020-01-22 13:54                       ` Jakub Jelinek
2020-01-22 17:41                   ` Richard Sandiford
2020-01-22 17:45                     ` Marek Polacek
2020-01-22 17:50                       ` Richard Earnshaw (lists)
2020-01-22  9:07       ` Segher Boessenkool
2020-01-22 16:05         ` Richard Earnshaw (lists)
2020-01-22 16:37           ` Segher Boessenkool
2020-01-22 18:49       ` [PATCH, v3] " Richard Earnshaw (lists)
2020-02-03 11:41         ` Richard Earnshaw (lists)
2020-02-03 11:54           ` Alexander Monakov
2020-02-03 11:59             ` Richard Earnshaw (lists)
2020-02-03 12:51               ` Alexander Monakov
2020-02-03 14:11                 ` Jason Merrill
2020-02-03 15:13                   ` Richard Earnshaw (lists)
2020-02-03 15:15                     ` Richard Earnshaw (lists)
2020-02-03 13:54             ` Segher Boessenkool
2020-02-03 14:00               ` Richard Earnshaw (lists)
2020-02-03 14:13                 ` Jonathan Wakely
2020-02-03 15:05                   ` Richard Earnshaw (lists)
2020-02-03 16:12                     ` Andrew Clayton
2020-02-03 17:17                 ` Segher Boessenkool
2020-02-03 17:19                 ` Segher Boessenkool
2020-02-03 17:31                 ` Michael Matz
2020-02-03 17:36                   ` Richard Earnshaw (lists)
2020-02-03 17:49                     ` Michael Matz
2020-02-03 17:54                       ` Richard Earnshaw (lists)
2020-02-03 18:20                         ` Michael Matz
2020-02-03 19:48                           ` Segher Boessenkool
2020-02-03 17:54                       ` Jakub Jelinek
2020-02-03 18:09                         ` Michael Matz
2020-02-04 10:41                           ` Andrew Stubbs
2020-02-03 18:57                         ` Segher Boessenkool
2020-02-03 18:03                       ` Joseph Myers [this message]
2020-02-03 17:34                 ` Segher Boessenkool
2020-02-27 13:38           ` Nathan Sidwell
2020-03-02 13:01             ` Richard Earnshaw (lists)
2020-03-02 13:35               ` Segher Boessenkool
2020-03-02 14:31               ` Nathan Sidwell
2020-03-02 14:41                 ` Jonathan Wakely
2020-03-02 15:22                   ` Richard Earnshaw (lists)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.21.2002031801230.5638@digraph.polyomino.org.uk \
    --to=joseph@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com \
    --cc=amonakov@ispras.ru \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gerald@pfeifer.com \
    --cc=matz@suse.de \
    --cc=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).