From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21527 invoked by alias); 6 Feb 2011 23:58:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 21380 invoked by uid 22791); 6 Feb 2011 23:58:02 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_SOFTFAIL,TW_FD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from relay02.pair.com (HELO relay02.pair.com) (209.68.5.16) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with SMTP; Sun, 06 Feb 2011 23:57:56 +0000 Received: (qmail 45393 invoked from network); 6 Feb 2011 23:57:54 -0000 Received: from 2.205.204.203 (HELO ip-2-205-204-203.web.vodafone.de) (2.205.204.203) by relay02.pair.com with SMTP; 6 Feb 2011 23:57:54 -0000 X-pair-Authenticated: 2.205.204.203 Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2011 23:58:00 -0000 From: Gerald Pfeifer To: Jonathan Wakely cc: libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org, gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [doc,patch] Move from GFDL 1.2 to GFDL 1.3 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="8323584-709724789-1297036679=:8943" X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-02/txt/msg00091.txt.bz2 This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --8323584-709724789-1297036679=:8943 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Content-length: 771 On Mon, 14 Jun 2010, Jonathan Wakely wrote: >>>> And wouldn't it be appropriate to remove doc/xml/gnu/fdl-1.2.xml now >>>> that you have added fdl-1.3.xml? >>> Possibly. We still have gpl-2.0.xml there, which doesn't seem to be >>> included.  I followed that example. >> >> If you are not using GPL 2.0 nor FDL 1.2 anymore in libstdc++ (and we >> should not be using these two anymore in all of GCC), we should remove >> them.  Would you mind doing that or should I give it a try? > I can do that, assuming no objections from the other maintainers. Hmm, I see that these two are still in there. We should not be using them anymore. Would you mind removing them, or do you see a problem? (It would be good to make the same change for GCC 4.5 as well.) Thanks, Gerald --8323584-709724789-1297036679=:8943--