public inbox for gcc@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexander Monakov <amonakov@ispras.ru>
To: "Richard Earnshaw (lists)" <Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com>
Cc: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com>,
	gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org,     GCC Development <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH, v3] wwwdocs: e-mail subject lines for contributions
Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2020 12:51:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.20.13.2002031547500.22653@monopod.intra.ispras.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e91ac427-06f0-845a-5450-09998d8d4dc6@arm.com>

On Mon, 3 Feb 2020, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:

> Upper case is what glibc has, though it appears that it's a rule that is not
> strictly followed.  If we change it, then it becomes another friction point
> between developer groups.  Personally, I'd leave it as is, then turn a blind
> eye to such minor non-conformance.

In that case can we simply say that both 'committed' and 'COMMITTED' are okay,
if we know glibc doesn't follow that rule and anticipate we will not follow
it either?

Thanks.
Alexander

  reply	other threads:[~2020-02-03 12:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <c3928f40-2d71-fb5b-f2e0-3878ac88a2b7@arm.com>
     [not found] ` <alpine.LSU.2.21.2001191425160.739@anthias.pfeifer.com>
     [not found]   ` <353faf3e-bf43-eb4d-542d-45a53dce77b2@arm.com>
2020-01-21 15:40     ` [PATCH, v2] " Richard Earnshaw (lists)
2020-01-21 16:03       ` Jakub Jelinek
2020-01-21 16:14         ` Richard Earnshaw (lists)
2020-01-21 16:38           ` Jakub Jelinek
2020-01-21 16:43             ` Richard Earnshaw (lists)
2020-01-21 19:27               ` Jason Merrill
2020-01-22  3:46                 ` Richard Earnshaw (lists)
2020-01-22 10:00                   ` Jakub Jelinek
2020-01-22 13:50                     ` Richard Earnshaw (lists)
2020-01-22 13:54                       ` Jakub Jelinek
2020-01-22 17:41                   ` Richard Sandiford
2020-01-22 17:45                     ` Marek Polacek
2020-01-22 17:50                       ` Richard Earnshaw (lists)
2020-01-22  9:07       ` Segher Boessenkool
2020-01-22 16:05         ` Richard Earnshaw (lists)
2020-01-22 16:37           ` Segher Boessenkool
2020-01-22 18:49       ` [PATCH, v3] " Richard Earnshaw (lists)
2020-02-03 11:41         ` Richard Earnshaw (lists)
2020-02-03 11:54           ` Alexander Monakov
2020-02-03 11:59             ` Richard Earnshaw (lists)
2020-02-03 12:51               ` Alexander Monakov [this message]
2020-02-03 14:11                 ` Jason Merrill
2020-02-03 15:13                   ` Richard Earnshaw (lists)
2020-02-03 15:15                     ` Richard Earnshaw (lists)
2020-02-03 13:54             ` Segher Boessenkool
2020-02-03 14:00               ` Richard Earnshaw (lists)
2020-02-03 14:13                 ` Jonathan Wakely
2020-02-03 15:05                   ` Richard Earnshaw (lists)
2020-02-03 16:12                     ` Andrew Clayton
2020-02-03 17:17                 ` Segher Boessenkool
2020-02-03 17:19                 ` Segher Boessenkool
2020-02-03 17:31                 ` Michael Matz
2020-02-03 17:36                   ` Richard Earnshaw (lists)
2020-02-03 17:49                     ` Michael Matz
2020-02-03 17:54                       ` Jakub Jelinek
2020-02-03 18:09                         ` Michael Matz
2020-02-04 10:41                           ` Andrew Stubbs
2020-02-03 18:57                         ` Segher Boessenkool
2020-02-03 17:54                       ` Richard Earnshaw (lists)
2020-02-03 18:20                         ` Michael Matz
2020-02-03 19:48                           ` Segher Boessenkool
2020-02-03 18:03                       ` Joseph Myers
2020-02-03 17:34                 ` Segher Boessenkool
2020-02-27 13:38           ` Nathan Sidwell
2020-03-02 13:01             ` Richard Earnshaw (lists)
2020-03-02 13:35               ` Segher Boessenkool
2020-03-02 14:31               ` Nathan Sidwell
2020-03-02 14:41                 ` Jonathan Wakely
2020-03-02 15:22                   ` Richard Earnshaw (lists)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.LNX.2.20.13.2002031547500.22653@monopod.intra.ispras.ru \
    --to=amonakov@ispras.ru \
    --cc=Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gerald@pfeifer.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).