From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-157462-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 3676 invoked by alias); 25 Oct 2009 14:54:30 -0000
Received: (qmail 3665 invoked by uid 22791); 25 Oct 2009 14:54:29 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (HELO vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at) (128.131.111.2)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 25 Oct 2009 14:54:25 +0000
Received: from acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at [128.131.111.60]) 	by vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC1DB1E087; 	Sun, 25 Oct 2009 15:54:20 +0100 (CET)
Received: by acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (Postfix, from userid 1203) 	id 8427D1005D; Sun, 25 Oct 2009 15:54:22 +0100 (CET)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) 	by acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FE4510059; 	Sun, 25 Oct 2009 15:54:22 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2009 18:32:00 -0000
From: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com>
To: Ben Elliston <bje@au1.ibm.com>
cc: Michael Matz <matz@suse.de>, Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>,      Paolo Bonzini <bonzini@gnu.org>,      "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph@codesourcery.com>,      Richard Guenther <richard.guenther@gmail.com>,      gdr@integrable-solutions.net, gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: delete dead feature branches?
In-Reply-To: <1255481458.22828.2.camel@helios>
Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.1.99.0910251553450.10975@acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at>
References: <h9in34$4pu$1@ger.gmane.org>   <Pine.LNX.4.64.0909251650450.30532@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>   <4ABD0F1E.5030807@redhat.com>   <206fcf960909251214u5770c7b5o141614226e28fdff@mail.gmail.com>   <84fc9c000909251220r62d518bka48cd3a13d0d5ea0@mail.gmail.com>    <Pine.LNX.4.64.0909251932570.6234@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>   <4AD33BA2.60107@gnu.org>  <4AD39C64.3020304@redhat.com>   <Pine.LNX.4.64.0910130303090.15566@wotan.suse.de> <1255481458.22828.2.camel@helios>
User-Agent: Alpine 1.99 (LSU 1142 2008-08-13)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2009-10/txt/msg00508.txt.bz2

On Wed, 14 Oct 2009, Ben Elliston wrote:
> I deleted a personal branch from 5 years ago and have added the revision 
> number of the delete commit to the branch description in svn.html.
> 
> Would these two conventions suffice?

Would it make sense to document the outcome of this conversation in 
svn.html?

Gerald