From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15207 invoked by alias); 7 Nov 2009 20:02:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 15095 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Nov 2009 20:02:45 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_JMF_BL,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (HELO vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at) (128.131.111.2) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 07 Nov 2009 20:02:41 +0000 Received: from acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at [128.131.111.60]) by vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60F8B1E0B5; Sat, 7 Nov 2009 21:02:37 +0100 (CET) Received: by acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (Postfix, from userid 1203) id 6566816047; Sat, 7 Nov 2009 21:02:40 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5430716041; Sat, 7 Nov 2009 21:02:40 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 07 Nov 2009 20:02:00 -0000 From: Gerald Pfeifer To: "Kaveh R. GHAZI" cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Updating Primary and Secondary platform list for gcc-4.5 ??? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 1.99 (LSU 1142 2008-08-13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-11/txt/msg00195.txt.bz2 On Sat, 7 Nov 2009, Kaveh R. GHAZI wrote: > 2. i386-unknown-freebsd and i686-apple-darwin are generic, but > config.guess will supply specific version numbers. What version > should MPC be shown to work on? Any one of them would do? For FreeBSD, I'd specify versions 6.x and above. Older versions should work down to 3.x or 4.x, but it is not worth bothering unless someone is into retro computing. On the contrary, FreeBSD 6.x to some extent, and now 7.x primarily and now also 8.x are tested and used regularily. > 3. For freebsd and darwin, do we want to include specific version > numbers for our platform list, or leave them generic? I think it's fine keeping things as are. If you prefer, we can also make it "whatever Gerald or Loren are currently testing" for FreeBSD, of course. ;-) Gerald