From: Michael Matz <matz@suse.de>
To: Richard Biener <richard.guenther@gmail.com>
Cc: Thomas Schwinge <thomas@codesourcery.com>,
GCC Development <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: 'walk_stmt_load_store_addr_ops' for non-'gimple_assign_single_p (stmt)'
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2021 13:27:26 +0000 (UTC) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.20.2103171315140.446@wotan.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFiYyc2Eu1OhkPyZbxxuW-S-PtD5NESxJ1Fgm9DffsBCBf8+jA@mail.gmail.com>
Hello,
On Wed, 17 Mar 2021, Richard Biener wrote:
> > The walk_gimple functions are intended to be used on the SSA form of
> > gimple (i.e. the one that it is in most of the time).
>
> Actually they are fine to use pre-SSA.
Structurally, sure.
> They just even pre-SSA distinguish between registers and memory.
And that's of course the thing.
I probably should have used a different term, but used "SSA rewriting" to
name the point where this distinction really starts to matter. Before it
a binary gimple statement could conceivably contain a non-register in the
LHS (perhaps not right now, but there's nothing that would inherently
break with that), and then would include a store that
walk_stmt_load_store_addr_ops would "miss".
So, yeah, using SSA as name for that was sloppy, it's gimple itself that
has the invariant of only registers in binary statements.
Ciao,
Michael.
> That's what gimplification honors as well, in 'zzz = r + r2' all
> operands are registers, otherwise GIMPLE requires loads and stores split
> into separate stmts not doing any computation.
>
> It's just less obivous in the dumps (compared to SSA name dumping).
>
> Richard.
>
> > And in that it's
> > not the case that 'zzz = 1' and 'zzz = r + r2' are similar. The former
> > can have memory as the lhs (that includes static variables, or indirection
> > through pointers), the latter can not. The lhs of a binary statement is
> > always an SSA name. A write to an SSA name is not a store, which is why
> > it's not walked for walk_stmt_load_store_addr_ops.
> >
> > Maybe it helps to look at simple C examples:
> >
> > % cat x.c
> > int zzz;
> > void foo(void) { zzz = 1; }
> > void bar(int i) { zzz = i + 1; }
> > % gcc -c x.c -fdump-tree-ssa-vops
> > % cat x.c.*ssa
> > foo ()
> > {
> > <bb 2> :
> > # .MEM_2 = VDEF <.MEM_1(D)>
> > zzz = 1;
> > # VUSE <.MEM_2>
> > return;
> > }
> >
> > bar (int i)
> > {
> > int _1;
> >
> > <bb 2> :
> > _1 = i_2(D) + 1;
> > # .MEM_4 = VDEF <.MEM_3(D)>
> > zzz = _1;
> > # VUSE <.MEM_4>
> > return;
> >
> > }
> >
> > See how the instruction writing to zzz (a global, and hence memory) is
> > going through a temporary for the addition in bar? This will always be
> > the case when the expression is arithmetic.
> >
> > In SSA form gimple only very few instruction types can be stores, namely
> > calls and stores like above (where the RHS is an unary tree). If you want
> > to capture writes into SSA names as well (which are more appropriately
> > thought of as 'setting the ssa name' or 'associating the ssa name with the
> > rhs value') you need the per-operand callback indeed. But that depends on
> > what you actually want to do.
> >
> >
> > Ciao,
> > Michael.
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-17 13:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-15 18:31 Thomas Schwinge
2021-03-15 19:17 ` Richard Biener
2021-03-16 15:02 ` Thomas Schwinge
2021-03-16 15:16 ` Richard Biener
2021-03-16 15:25 ` Michael Matz
2021-03-16 23:24 ` Thomas Schwinge
2021-03-17 7:46 ` Richard Biener
2021-03-18 12:32 ` Thomas Schwinge
2021-03-17 7:42 ` Richard Biener
2021-03-17 13:27 ` Michael Matz [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LSU.2.20.2103171315140.446@wotan.suse.de \
--to=matz@suse.de \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=richard.guenther@gmail.com \
--cc=thomas@codesourcery.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).