From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 86046 invoked by alias); 1 Apr 2018 20:16:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 86036 invoked by uid 89); 1 Apr 2018 20:16:05 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=settle, Hx-languages-length:461, our X-HELO: ainaz.pair.com Received: from ainaz.pair.com (HELO ainaz.pair.com) (209.68.2.66) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Sun, 01 Apr 2018 20:16:04 +0000 Received: from ainaz.pair.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ainaz.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13EA13F450; Sun, 1 Apr 2018 16:16:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: from anthias (vie-188-118-240-174.dsl.sil.at [188.118.240.174]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ainaz.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 31B093F426; Sun, 1 Apr 2018 16:16:01 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 01 Apr 2018 20:16:00 -0000 From: Gerald Pfeifer To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, Sandra Loosemore , "Joseph S. Myers" Subject: "file name" vs "filename" Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2018-04/txt/msg00008.txt.bz2 And now to the most important question of all. ;-) Should we use "file name" or "filename" when referring to the name of a file? Our docs currently are about even and I think it would be good to settle on one? % grep "filename" $GCC/gcc/doc/*.texi | wc -l 92 % grep "file name" $GCC/gcc/doc/*.texi | wc -l 103 (Once we have consensus, I'll add that to codingconventions.html and start by making the web pages consistent.) Gerald