From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 73345 invoked by alias); 11 Jan 2020 07:06:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 73336 invoked by uid 89); 11 Jan 2020 07:06:59 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy= X-HELO: hamza.pair.com Received: from hamza.pair.com (HELO hamza.pair.com) (209.68.5.143) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Jan 2020 07:06:58 +0000 Received: from hamza.pair.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hamza.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB99A33E25; Sat, 11 Jan 2020 02:06:56 -0500 (EST) Received: from anthias (simmu1-65-185.utaonline.at [62.218.65.185]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hamza.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5806733E24; Sat, 11 Jan 2020 02:06:55 -0500 (EST) Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2020 07:06:00 -0000 From: Gerald Pfeifer To: Joseph Myers cc: Jeff Law , "Eric S. Raymond" , Maxim Kuvyrkov , "Richard Earnshaw (lists)" , GCC Development , Alexandre Oliva , Segher Boessenkool , Mark Wielaard , Jakub Jelinek Subject: Re: Proposal for the transition timetable for the move to GIT In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20191226111633.GJ10088@tucnak> <5DCEA32B-3E36-4400-B931-9F4E2A8F3FA5@linaro.org> <155B5BFD-6ECF-4EBF-A38C-D6DD178FB497@linaro.org> <2b6330f2-1a00-ac89-fd3c-4b70e5454f4b@arm.com> <9B71A0F7-CD93-4636-BFC7-1D1DBC040F07@linaro.org> <6EE7BD53-6677-49D2-BCDD-56CD7DA855E9@linaro.org> <88B4DAF3-33C1-445F-8F5A-809D5463D0F9@linaro.org> <20200108221119.GA94728@thyrsus.com> <115bd7cf97041d72c3c49749c91d4518e682f90d.camel@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2020-01/txt/msg00156.txt.bz2 On Thu, 9 Jan 2020, Joseph Myers wrote: >> Is there any chance we could get one more trunk snapshot before the >> conversion starts -- even if that means firing up the snapshot process >> Friday? It'd be quite useful for the ongoing Fedora build testing. > I could run a snapshot manually. I was planning to run at least one > snapshot (for some branch) manually *after* the conversion to test the > conversion of the gcc_release script to use git (in snapshot mode that > doesn't make any commits so could be done while the git repository is > still read-only for checking). Saturday's the GCC 9 snapshots are on, Sunday's GCC 10, so with a GCC 10 snapshot out yesterday, perhaps run a GCC 9 snapshot today or tomorrow and then fall back to the regular cadence? Gerald