From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 125576 invoked by alias); 20 Jan 2020 17:51:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 125563 invoked by uid 89); 20 Jan 2020 17:51:01 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-8.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=H*f:sk:CAH6eHd, H*i:sk:CAH6eHd, tackle, you! X-HELO: hamza.pair.com Received: from hamza.pair.com (HELO hamza.pair.com) (209.68.5.143) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 17:50:51 +0000 Received: from hamza.pair.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hamza.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10E9133E4A; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 12:50:50 -0500 (EST) Received: from anthias (simmu1-65-185.utaonline.at [62.218.65.185]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hamza.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8C2B633E45; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 12:50:49 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 13:51:00 -0000 From: Gerald Pfeifer To: Jonathan Wakely cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Updating "regression hunting" to the Git world (was: [wwwdocs] Adjustments of "regression hunting" instructions to the post-SVN world.) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2020-01/txt/msg00368.txt.bz2 On Mon, 20 Jan 2020, Jonathan Wakely wrote: >> If you have further updates to that page, please go ahead and >> simply make them (or let me know). > It still says "The following SVN commands are ..." Yes, that's another piece I'll tackle today/tomorrow. >> Also contrib/reghunt appears in need of *quite* some updates. >> Or do we want to retire it? > I've never read that web page or looked at contrib/reghunt before, > but most of it can probably be done by 'git bisect' run. The web page > should be rewritten in terms of using git bisect. I can take a stab > at that if nobody else wants to. That would be great, thank you! Gerald