From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx2.suse.de (mx2.suse.de [195.135.220.15]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A936384F010; Mon, 31 May 2021 15:49:31 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 3A936384F010 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=suse.de Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=matz@suse.de X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_rsa; t=1622476170; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=oRVkp4aahoid5mM6SVw+TuNWp4KxrW4HYCquQp/lrdc=; b=LVx5UCGO/Oz9N81W5D+cJu/W5/9iSAkx7n88oEcnOwdZPF4hGQ1+58LeLwY/30vtYLPefS guaTqqajg/vhj8VFZVvEwoLWrEnOc3N/NcTkmay/y97g2evQ1edBMMnKa8BlPnY7+XRWoP nT+54yL7dUojvYp4jB62vD1CsbujV8Y= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1622476170; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=oRVkp4aahoid5mM6SVw+TuNWp4KxrW4HYCquQp/lrdc=; b=JJXpOjBRmMHxbp/UJ8RAd2afkir52uXpdD0v6mFJyD6LjucSH+Wi4MWAKicxvpEAt6BoIo OxMeZ76x2cl7atDA== Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.221.27]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0768AB4AF; Mon, 31 May 2021 15:49:30 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 31 May 2021 15:49:29 +0000 (UTC) From: Michael Matz To: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Martin_Li=A8ka?= cc: David Malcolm , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, GCC Development , "Joseph S. Myers" Subject: Re: GCC documentation: porting to Sphinx In-Reply-To: <3a2a573b-5185-fff5-f9da-6e5e39953ad6@suse.cz> Message-ID: References: <1446990946.2994.192.camel@surprise> <1a22bc37-3d48-132f-a3d5-219471cd443c@suse.cz> <3a2a573b-5185-fff5-f9da-6e5e39953ad6@suse.cz> User-Agent: Alpine 2.22 (LSU 394 2020-01-19) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, KAM_EU, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: gcc@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 May 2021 15:49:34 -0000 Hello Martin, On Mon, 31 May 2021, Martin Liška wrote: > I've made quite some progress with the porting of the documentation and > I would like to present it to the community now: > https://splichal.eu/scripts/sphinx/ > > Note the documentation is automatically ([1]) generated from texinfo with a > GitHub workflow ([2]). One other thing I was recently thinking about, in the Spinx vs. texinfo discussion: locally available documentation browsable/searchable in terminal with info(1) (or equivalents). I think the above (i.e. generating .rst from the texinfo file) would immediately nullify all my worries. So, just to be extra sure: your proposal now is to generate the .rst files, and that .texinfo remains the maintained sources, right? Ciao, Michael.