From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 71346 invoked by alias); 20 Dec 2019 14:34:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 71318 invoked by uid 89); 20 Dec 2019 14:34:39 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=conduct, saw, flying, claim X-HELO: cc-smtpout3.netcologne.de Received: from cc-smtpout3.netcologne.de (HELO cc-smtpout3.netcologne.de) (89.1.8.213) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 Dec 2019 14:34:38 +0000 Received: from cc-smtpin2.netcologne.de (cc-smtpin2.netcologne.de [89.1.8.202]) by cc-smtpout3.netcologne.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C36312526; Fri, 20 Dec 2019 15:34:36 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=netcologne.de; s=nc1116a; t=1576852476; bh=biS4SPBgtNgCJ3tQhvvpaEgpRvwVG9DkI93WLvmrws0=; h=To:From:Subject:Message-ID:Date:From; b=gmKVhlsoXVgzuEkpL28ZdD6reKhdOzQYXCTEhd+RGNBnf4u9yvnaBNjdtkZVGxGe3 WiT/RfSE9v65IzFoz6j220eOvoB98/n8zIu5NxXPDPEMXpK44yQLIXZNNKOJ8GiJwv 4r7mkMgdu25wm9nhJC/1drhG14swISn5ftzTAjNThOqoNR5KVcF1EUu9+IU5EgLWMR SADda7rRjvj7g++okpHKTo/tivcw6SFrVQRF/dWfHSz+TexYcLLITF/17Qn43Ou0qD zIWATxBX/N2lrmSiC0LUmzbjV4WiT54C8vJpvCzPDQtaLxDe7STdL8Zh6T7OUWPfI5 idHSoKTWul+Jw== Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cc-smtpin2.netcologne.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1381911F27; Fri, 20 Dec 2019 15:34:36 +0100 (CET) Received: from [2001:4dd4:de16:0:7285:c2ff:fe6c:992d] (helo=cc-smtpin2.netcologne.de) by localhost with ESMTP (eXpurgate 4.11.6) (envelope-from ) id 5dfcdbfb-3658-7f0000012729-7f000001ca38-1 for ; Fri, 20 Dec 2019 15:34:35 +0100 Received: from [IPv6:2001:4dd4:de16:0:7285:c2ff:fe6c:992d] (2001-4dd4-de16-0-7285-c2ff-fe6c-992d.ipv6dyn.netcologne.de [IPv6:2001:4dd4:de16:0:7285:c2ff:fe6c:992d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by cc-smtpin2.netcologne.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Fri, 20 Dec 2019 15:34:33 +0100 (CET) To: "fortran@gcc.gnu.org" , gcc mailing list , gcc-patches From: Thomas Koenig Subject: OpenACC regression and development pace Message-ID: Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2019 14:34:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2019-12/txt/msg00364.txt.bz2 Hi, I just saw this: FAIL: gfortran.dg/goacc/finalize-1.f -O scan-tree-dump-times gimple "(?n)#pragma omp target oacc_enter_exit_data map\\(delete:MEM\\[\\(c_char \\*\\)[^\\]]+\\] \\[len: [^\\]]+\\]\\) map\\(to:del_f_p \\[pointer set, len: [0-9]+\\]\\) map\\(alloc:del_f_p\\.data \\[pointer assign, bias: [^\\]]+\\]\\) finalize$" 1 FAIL: gfortran.dg/goacc/finalize-1.f -O scan-tree-dump-times gimple "(?n)#pragma omp target oacc_enter_exit_data map\\(force_from:MEM\\[\\(c_char \\*\\)[^\\]]+\\] \\[len: [^\\]]+\\]\\) map\\(to:cpo_f_p \\[pointer set, len: [0-9]+\\]\\) map\\(alloc:cpo_f_p\\.data \\[pointer assign, bias: [^\\]]+\\]\\) finalize$" 1 Regarding what is currently going on with OpenACC: I do not claim to understand this area of the compiler, but it certainly seems that the current development is too hasty - too many patches flying around, too many regressions occurring. It might be better to slow this down somewhat, and to conduct a more throrough review process before committing. Regards Thomas