From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-157843-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 12901 invoked by alias); 9 Nov 2009 12:52:49 -0000
Received: (qmail 12891 invoked by uid 22791); 9 Nov 2009 12:52:49 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.1 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SARE_MSGID_LONG40,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from smtp-out.google.com (HELO smtp-out.google.com) (216.239.45.13)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 Nov 2009 12:52:44 +0000
Received: from zps35.corp.google.com (zps35.corp.google.com [172.25.146.35]) 	by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id nA9CqfD2026144 	for <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>; Mon, 9 Nov 2009 04:52:42 -0800
Received: from qw-out-1920.google.com (qwc5.prod.google.com [10.241.193.133]) 	by zps35.corp.google.com with ESMTP id nA9Cqcto025076 	for <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>; Mon, 9 Nov 2009 04:52:39 -0800
Received: by qw-out-1920.google.com with SMTP id 5so463478qwc.46         for <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>; Mon, 09 Nov 2009 04:52:38 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.229.37.130 with SMTP id x2mr1043024qcd.15.1257771158443; Mon,  	09 Nov 2009 04:52:38 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <84fc9c000911090447jcda0a3bje34fab297ad9fbb5@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4AF74E2A.2030703@starynkevitch.net> 	 <b798aad50911090435q69b5f28fv961fb1cafab8310f@mail.gmail.com> 	 <84fc9c000911090447jcda0a3bje34fab297ad9fbb5@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2009 12:52:00 -0000
Message-ID: <b798aad50911090452qa0b63e6n8f17002e3c7163a7@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: is LTO aimed for large programs?
From: Diego Novillo <dnovillo@google.com>
To: Richard Guenther <richard.guenther@gmail.com>
Cc: Basile STARYNKEVITCH <basile@starynkevitch.net>,         GCC Mailing List <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-System-Of-Record: true
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2009-11/txt/msg00243.txt.bz2

On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 07:47, Richard Guenther
<richard.guenther@gmail.com> wrote:

> So I don't believe you ;) =C2=A0Even with 400 thousand cgraph nodes
> you'd run out of virtual memory on 32bits unless the cgraph
> node size on 32bit is less than 10 bytes which it is of course not ...

You are right.  I was thinking 400k, not 400m.  Sorry about that.


Diego.