public inbox for gcc@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mohamed Shafi <shafitvm@gmail.com>
To: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Cc: GCC <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: About feasibility of implementing an instruction
Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 07:31:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ba0bd44d0908142110s7190290dpa40c342bcf81709a@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m3ljn6rhqp.fsf@google.com>

2009/7/3 Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>:
> Mohamed Shafi <shafitvm@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> I just want to know about the feasibility of implementing an
>> instruction for a port in gcc 4.4
>> The target has 40 bit register where the normal load/store/move
>> instructions will be able to access the 32 bits of the register. In
>> order to move data into the rest of the register [b32 to b39] the data
>> has to be stored into a 32bit memory location. The data should be
>> stored in such a way that if it is stored for 0-7 in memory the data
>> can be moved to b32-b39 of a even register and if the data in the
>> memory is stored in 16-23 of the memory word then it can be moved to
>> b32-b39 of a odd register. Hope i make myself clear.
>>
>> Will it be possible to implement this in the gcc back-end so that the
>> particular instruction is supported?
>
> In general, the gcc backend can do anything, so, yes, this can be
> supported.  It sounds like this is not a general purpose register, so I
> would probably do it using a builtin function.  If you need to treat it
> as a general purpose register (i.e., the register is managed by the
> register allocator) then you will need a secondary reload to handle
> this.
>

This is a general purpose register. All the 40 bits are used only for
fixed-point data types. When the register is used for fixed-point data
type all the operations except initialization, are done through
built-in functions. For initialization the immediate value should move
through a memory ..i.e there is no immediate load when the data is
40bit. So i am planning to control this using LEGITIMATE_CONSTANT
macro. But then i have a question. If all the operations are through
intrinsics will there be a need for spilling for the variables used in
the built-in functions? If so then depending on the register that get
spilled is even or odd [b32 to b39] of the register gets stored in the
memory to [b0 to b7] or [b16 tr b23] respectively. Will i be able to
keep track of the spilling so that i can reload into the proper
register?

Hope i am clear.

Regards
Shafi

      reply	other threads:[~2009-08-15  4:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-07-02  4:59 Mohamed Shafi
2009-07-02 19:46 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2009-08-15  7:31   ` Mohamed Shafi [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ba0bd44d0908142110s7190290dpa40c342bcf81709a@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=shafitvm@gmail.com \
    --cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=iant@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).