From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15072 invoked by alias); 23 Apr 2010 04:11:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 15060 invoked by uid 22791); 23 Apr 2010 04:11:12 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from lo.gmane.org (HELO lo.gmane.org) (80.91.229.12) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 04:11:07 +0000 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O5AEH-0005HV-8S for gcc@gcc.gnu.org; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 06:11:01 +0200 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 06:11:01 +0200 Received: from miles by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 06:11:01 +0200 To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org connect(): No such file or directory From: Miles Bader Subject: Re: Code assistance with GCC Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 04:47:00 -0000 Message-ID: References: <4BCED45A.6040609@cx4a.org> <73193A25-EF3D-4B9B-B7E3-640AC749B95E@apple.com> <4BCF3A9C.3020606@redhat.com> <85965255-1A83-4081-9E4C-16E6B6C91981@apple.com> <20100422112902.GE5553@sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii System-Type: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Blat: Foop X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-04/txt/msg00545.txt.bz2 Chris Lattner writes: >>> I did this because the other responses made it seem that it wasn't >>> something that would be accepted back into GCC proper. Maintaining an >> >> Can you point at any response that said it would not be accepted back into >> GCC proper? There were no such comments AFAIK. All that has been said >> is that it is not possible to implement it AS A PLUGIN, > > Nope, you are correct. Again, the cc was a mistake and I apologize for it. But people aren't objecting to the CC, they're objecting to the message you were (apparently) trying to send to the original poster. If anything, the CC was _good_, because it allowed some measure of debate. -Miles -- Fast, small, soon; pick any 2.