From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 81043 invoked by alias); 16 Dec 2019 16:47:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 81026 invoked by uid 89); 16 Dec 2019 16:47:24 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=comfortable, preference, We'll, his X-HELO: us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com Received: from us-smtp-2.mimecast.com (HELO us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com) (205.139.110.61) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Dec 2019 16:47:23 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1576514841; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=l+JViLGrYgREQzMqbtvM4sudzZelMYs6e016Pil/XPY=; b=TH1eeaNAdGmit9dsv0KSWCnSx0JjI7tJjS88NFdQoxbddk6onLz5fbmFd1qtPRADgqEYAn eUw3M7jlU3uNj1P9Zn7kKqfkGZ/1zuhIklTjxRDxCLKH2WUMQH5gYHIti3XM9bAJKXkTDs 5FHWQUJOZW/+fVLm3p1oEaRKYjBTqSE= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-372-ui9A3fHBMzyc02FrSitbLw-1; Mon, 16 Dec 2019 11:47:20 -0500 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E3D5A189CD19; Mon, 16 Dec 2019 16:47:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ovpn-112-27.phx2.redhat.com (ovpn-112-27.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.112.27]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9753675B0; Mon, 16 Dec 2019 16:47:16 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: Subject: Re: Proposal for the transition timetable for the move to GIT From: Jeff Law Reply-To: law@redhat.com To: esr@thyrsus.com Cc: Segher Boessenkool , Mark Wielaard , Joseph Myers , Maxim Kuvyrkov , "Richard Earnshaw (lists)" , gcc@gcc.gnu.org Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2019 16:47:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20191216163722.GB118510@thyrsus.com> References: <1685e719-738f-dd4e-c39c-c08e495b202e@arm.com> <9E009921-96EA-44A2-A06A-232711227E69@linaro.org> <20191216133632.GC3152@gate.crashing.org> <20191216135451.GA3142@thyrsus.com> <472727a6df343073911d07008ca361b42167038a.camel@redhat.com> <20191216163722.GB118510@thyrsus.com> User-Agent: Evolution 3.34.2 (3.34.2-1.fc31) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2019-12/txt/msg00243.txt.bz2 On Mon, 2019-12-16 at 11:37 -0500, Eric S. Raymond wrote: > Jeff Law : > > > It may not be my place to say, but...I think the stakes are pretty > > > high here. If I were a GCC developer, I think I'd want the best > > > possible conversion even if that takes a little longer. > > Well, I'm not sure that's entirely true. > > OK, that's a policy choice the GCC project is going to have to make. > I'm just the mechanic here. Yup. And I wouldn't be surprised if there is dissent regardless of what final decision is made. > > Joseph Myers has made his choice. He has said repeatedly that he > wants to follow through with the reposurgeon conversion, and he's > putting his effort behind that by writing tests and even contributing > code to reposurgeon. > > We'll get this done faster if nobody is joggling his elbow. Or mine. And just to be clear, my preference is for reposurgeon, if it's ready. But if it isn't, then I'm absolutely comfortable dropping back to Maxim's conversion or even the existing mirror. Jeff