From: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
To: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>,
gcc@gcc.gnu.org, libc-alpha@sourceware.org,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
Iain Sandoe <idsandoe@googlemail.com>
Subject: Re: Disabling TLS address caching to help QEMU on GNU/Linux
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2021 09:22:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c9ce99db-874b-03c2-9561-be9b59bd1988@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87im15qbp3.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com>
On 20/07/2021 16.52, Florian Weimer wrote:
> Currently, the GNU/Linux ABI does not really specify whether the thread
> pointer (the address of the TCB) may change at a function boundary.
[...]
> One important piece of software for GNU is QEMU (not just for GNU/Linux,
> Hurd development also benefits from virtualization). QEMU uses stackful
> coroutines extensively. There are some hard-to-change code areas where
> resumption happens across threads unfortunately. These increasingly
> cause problems with more inlining, inter-procedural analysis, and a
> general push towards LTO (which is also needed for some security
> hardening features).
Thanks a lot for your mail, Florian!
As a context for those who read about this for the very first time: We're
currently facing the problem that the coroutines in QEMU fail when compiling
QEMU with -flto on a non-x86 architecture, see:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1952483#c6
> Should the GNU toolchain offer something to help out the QEMU
> developers?
I guess that would be extremely helpful...
Thomas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-21 7:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-20 14:52 Florian Weimer
2021-07-20 15:31 ` Iain Sandoe
2021-07-21 7:22 ` Thomas Huth [this message]
2021-07-22 12:12 ` Richard Biener
2021-07-22 16:01 ` Michael Matz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c9ce99db-874b-03c2-9561-be9b59bd1988@redhat.com \
--to=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=idsandoe@googlemail.com \
--cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).