From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC3A5385DC3A for ; Sat, 9 Mar 2024 02:18:16 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org EC3A5385DC3A Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org EC3A5385DC3A Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=148.163.156.1 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1709950698; cv=none; b=Ny/iBvGoZauZoLUZBa+x3b4VFZAtJqNhBhOfnVpxaW6kTn5DBXo8fiROQCXxfePa0cvFrAVJu7+cb1xLW+AcP43CT25UGatUAWVRBriHh9xqiuje4jEm54zbo6/hrodGGx/QtLh02fnlR0TTxkC4hjDj0Z8UdSXDlq+ND+xEvtY= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1709950698; c=relaxed/simple; bh=oLYWRGRir5IG0D9JlnnEw02rMHT+Apau0aaCMmFKUg4=; h=DKIM-Signature:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:From; b=fAoknBSrujFsWmxyrQeW/rknzBZWVPDPZiQcVytTr5Mi+GWvQvKFZhszo9i/aiDnHo066BN2m6CKDWnDFflIKCU8EZp/6qGI14gEET7ylks2yP9r4TwWIMw1VynOt4U4Rrh94qFDilRwvSUjLt0EUHh3V4s28CU8kJZpxWYmZME= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org Received: from pps.filterd (m0353726.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id 42927D9f019301; Sat, 9 Mar 2024 02:18:09 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=message-id : date : mime-version : subject : to : cc : references : from : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=YRdLmHrq7GQ2GHDySFassEKNYweY1TzLpoJERt+9FmI=; b=tlDvnRMMoSK09Puk1IBDw4qj0z7QJqINS1Ucoc4Zupk9YDXQ0y37/NGZIdZXEFKcBHUP 3S0oS1b+0i0LuJzIhABWo0K0K+YEK+H53mDqcSy38z6jjYdKrY7+rEXLbCopfXVER6YO v6FfBwNKorRONYLsduUh0KWoa22aXowQKf/dohCi/daibehp5rmx+JC617w+KmQg1T/j 6vds+jIaOojnsZGEQldxSt1xc81AE6j55lyBjYuKCycM3Bkf3fdaeso27ubZP/5D5nu+ L32kGfml4zcOAFQnrA/MQelSV1IOZ9ao+088T3Qp1/InBc4B4g3U7Ja2VhjuZh1IahQ7 WQ== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3wrepv82xy-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 09 Mar 2024 02:18:09 +0000 Received: from m0353726.ppops.net (m0353726.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 4292856v021287; Sat, 9 Mar 2024 02:18:08 GMT Received: from ppma21.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (5b.69.3da9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.61.105.91]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3wrepv82xs-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 09 Mar 2024 02:18:08 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma21.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma21.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id 428N8Bsi026183; Sat, 9 Mar 2024 02:18:07 GMT Received: from smtprelay02.dal12v.mail.ibm.com ([172.16.1.4]) by ppma21.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3wmfepg84v-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 09 Mar 2024 02:18:07 +0000 Received: from smtpav06.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (smtpav06.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com [10.39.53.233]) by smtprelay02.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 4292I4F720120200 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Sat, 9 Mar 2024 02:18:06 GMT Received: from smtpav06.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 786B558066; Sat, 9 Mar 2024 02:18:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpav06.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBB1A5803F; Sat, 9 Mar 2024 02:18:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [9.61.160.201] (unknown [9.61.160.201]) by smtpav06.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Sat, 9 Mar 2024 02:18:03 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2024 20:18:03 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: Stepping up as maintainer for ia64 Content-Language: en-US To: Jonathan Wakely , Frank Scheiner Cc: Richard Biener , =?UTF-8?Q?Ren=C3=A9_Rebe?= , GCC Administrator via Gcc , jeffreyalaw@gmail.com References: <45833A6D-A84C-4276-AADB-BE2923886F64@exactcode.de> <3DAB006A-ACE2-4BEC-AA01-87625DBEE259@exactcode.de> <5q04803q-19o1-7244-5o14-42s55qsr1212@fhfr.qr> <7928dec0-4ea2-4707-80c4-e07c86d35eb1@linux.ibm.com> <67244113-4ebd-4ef7-aad3-dd3593cda532@web.de> From: Peter Bergner In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: mXTz-mMDEE4sunvBw4wcgQ-JmTbOJYqw X-Proofpoint-GUID: qhYLTWIq6ZUkuIPj0CLJGbfHxSUsKOy0 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.272,Aquarius:18.0.1011,Hydra:6.0.619,FMLib:17.11.176.26 definitions=2024-03-08_08,2024-03-06_01,2023-05-22_02 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 impostorscore=0 mlxscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 clxscore=1015 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 malwarescore=0 bulkscore=0 mlxlogscore=706 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2311290000 definitions=main-2403090017 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_EF,KAM_NUMSUBJECT,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On 3/8/24 5:28 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On Fri, 8 Mar 2024 at 22:35, Frank Scheiner via Gcc wrote: >> >> On 08.03.24 23:00, Peter Bergner wrote: >>> On 3/8/24 7:16 AM, Richard Biener via Gcc wrote: >>>> I CCed Jeff who is on the commitee to forward the maintainer proposal >>>> though I guess this will not go forward as a first step. Instead >>>> you are probably expected to show activity on the port, for example >>>> post the patch series to make ia64 use LRA, get write access to the >>>> git repository and then be promoted maintainer. >>> >>> One other method for showing activity is posting regular testsuite >>> results on the gcc-testresults mailing list to show the community >>> the port is "working". >> >> I don't want to spam this or the other list each and every week, but I > > Sending test results to the gcc-testresults list is **not** spamming, > that's what the list is for! 100% agree! If you look at what we (IBM) post, we roughly post somewhere around 7 testsuite results per day due to runs on different hardware, endianness and OS (Linux versus AIX). So spam ...err... post away! > If you're testing uncommon targets (e.g. ia64-linux) then sending test > results to the list is essential so we know the target builds, because > nobody else is testing it. Again, 100% agree! Peter