* suggestion for ppl and cloog-ppl configure enhancement
@ 2010-01-13 19:56 Rainer Emrich
2010-01-13 21:01 ` Sebastian Pop
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Rainer Emrich @ 2010-01-13 19:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc; +Cc: Sebastian Pop
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
IMHO it would be a godd idea to add the following two configure options to ppl
configure:
--with-gmp-include=DIR GMP include directory
--with-gmp-lib=DIR GMP lib directory
On 64-bit Linux systems you have the libraries in lib64 instead of lib in most
cases. With this additional configure options in place you do not need to fiddle
with LDFLAFS to find the library.
OTOH I think one may drop --with-libgmpxx-prefix because it's very unlikely that
libgmpxx is installed in a different place than libgmp.
I sent this to the ppl-devel list too.
Same holds for cloog-ppl, here --with-ppl-include and --with-ppl-lib is missing.
Sebastian what do you think?
Cheers
Rainer
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAktOJUkACgkQoUhjsh59BL6+ywCgtTdQ3Ko9iW5nfloG7bcJ+KHU
U2MAoIRw20ISm2zQG+uomjDckT9Wzfzq
=zndb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: suggestion for ppl and cloog-ppl configure enhancement
2010-01-13 19:56 suggestion for ppl and cloog-ppl configure enhancement Rainer Emrich
@ 2010-01-13 21:01 ` Sebastian Pop
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Sebastian Pop @ 2010-01-13 21:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rainer Emrich; +Cc: gcc
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 14:55, Rainer Emrich <rainer@emrich-ebersheim.de> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> IMHO it would be a godd idea to add the following two configure options to ppl
> configure:
> --with-gmp-include=DIR GMP include directory
> --with-gmp-lib=DIR GMP lib directory
>
> On 64-bit Linux systems you have the libraries in lib64 instead of lib in most
> cases. With this additional configure options in place you do not need to fiddle
> with LDFLAFS to find the library.
> OTOH I think one may drop --with-libgmpxx-prefix because it's very unlikely that
> libgmpxx is installed in a different place than libgmp.
>
> I sent this to the ppl-devel list too.
>
>
> Same holds for cloog-ppl, here --with-ppl-include and --with-ppl-lib is missing.
> Sebastian what do you think?
I'm fine with these new config flags: patches are welcome, but keep in
mind to post the changes related to PPL to the PPL mailing list, see
http://www.cs.unipr.it/ppl/ and the changes related to CLooG to
http://groups.google.com/group/cloog-development
Sebastian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-01-13 21:01 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-01-13 19:56 suggestion for ppl and cloog-ppl configure enhancement Rainer Emrich
2010-01-13 21:01 ` Sebastian Pop
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).